监察体制改革背景下检察权的新定性  

New Qualitative Analysis of Procuratorial Power under the Background of Supervision System Reform

作　　者：洪骥 许永进 HONG Ji;XU Yongjin(College of Humanities and Social Science,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing,Jiangsu 211106,China;People’s Procuratorate of Sheyang County,Yancheng,Jiangsu 224300,China)

机构地区：[1]南京航空航天大学人文与社会科学学院,江苏南京211106 [2]江苏省射阳县人民检察院,江苏盐城224300

出　　处：《南京航空航天大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第2期64-69,共6页Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics（Social Sciences）

基　　金：江苏省法学会法学研究课题(SFH2020D07)。

摘　　要：作为检察权基础问题的检察权定性问题事关“法治中国建设”和中国宪治发展。在监察体制改革背景之下,检察权应被重新定性为“司法监察权”。“司法监察权”是对关于检察权性质的“司法权说”“控诉权说”“双重性说”和“法律监督说”的扬弃,其意味着检察权应是一种“监察体系”中的监督权或督察权,故其对于人民法院的裁判权、公安机关的侦查权、行政机关的执法权和监察委的调查权都具有针对性。在“司法监察权”的定性之下,“两反转隶”所对应的监察体制改革不是“弱化”而是“强化”了检察权。As the fundamental issue of procuratorial power,the qualitative issue of procuratorial power is direct⁃ly related to the construction of China’s Rule of Law and the development of China’s constitutional government.Under the background of supervision system reform,procuratorial power should be redefined as judicial supervi⁃sion power which refers to the sublation of the judicial power theory,prosecution power theory,duality theory and legal supervision theory about the nature of procuratorial power.It means that the procuratorial power should be a kind of supervision power in the supervision system which relates to the jurisdiction of the people’s court,the investigation power of the public security organ,the law enforcement power of the administrative organ and the investigation power of the supervision committee.Under the nature of judicial supervision power,the corre⁃sponding reform of supervision system has not“weakened”,but“strengthened”the procuratorial power.

关 键 词：监察体制改革 检察权 司法权 司法监察权 

分 类 号：D921.14[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]