I Don’t Peer-Review for Non-Open Journals,and Neither Should You  

作　　者：Michael P.Taylor 

机构地区：[1]Department of Earth Sciences,University of Bristol,Bristol BS81RJ,England

出　　处：《Journal of Data and Information Science》2022年第2期1-3,共3页数据与情报科学学报（英文版）

摘　　要：“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world;the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.”-Maxims for Revolutionists,George Bernard Shaw(1903).In the twenty years since the Budapest Open Access Initiative(BOAI,2002)defined the term“open access”(OA)and laid out the unanswerable case in its favour,the growth of OA has been inexorable.Legacy publishers,dependent on the revenue stream provided by subscriptions,have repeatedly attempted to stem this tide,and have certainly succeeded in delaying it-to no-one’s benefit but their own.But OA progresses despite this rearguard action,especially in recent years through the adoption by many major research funders of the Plan S declaration(Plan S,2018),that open-access publication is a condition of grant funding.At the time of writing,over half of all newly published papers are open access either immediately or within a few months(Piwowar,Priem,&Orr,2019),and the proportion continues to increase rapidly.

关 键 词：Open repeatedly CONTINUE 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]