检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚瑞鑫 郭会利 张斌青 叶艳君 Yao Ruixin;Guo Huili;Zhang Binqing;Ye Yanjun(Henan University of Trditonal Chinese Medicine,Zhengzhou,Henan 450046;Imaging Center,Luoyang Orthopaedie Hopital(Henan Province,Henan Orthopaedic Hospital),Luoyang,Henan 471000)
机构地区:[1]河南中医药大学,河南郑州450046 [2]河南省洛阳正骨医院(河南省骨科医院)影像中心,河南洛阳471000
出 处:《现代医用影像学》2022年第3期408-412,共5页Modern Medical Imageology
摘 要:目的:探究磁共振成像在创伤性臂丛神经损伤中的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析41例创伤性臂丛神经损伤的磁共振表现,并与手术探查结果作对比。结果:MRI诊断与手术探查在诊断神经周围水肿、瘢痕、神经瘤、根性撕脱伤、节后神经断裂以及创伤性脊膜囊肿方面差异均不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。MRI诊断神经周围水肿、瘢痕、神经瘤、根性撕脱伤、节后神经断裂以及创伤性脊膜囊肿的敏感性分别为86.8%、65.4%、57.1%、78.6%、66.7%、78.2%;特异性分别为66.7%、86.7%、100.0%、92.3%、82.3%、94.4%;准确度分别为82.9%、73.2%、92.7%、80.5%、73.2%、85.4%;阳性预测值分别为97.1%、89.5、100.0%、91.7%、84.2%、94.7%;阴性预测值分别为28.6%、59.1%、91.9%、64.7%、63.6%、77.3%。若将创伤性脊膜囊肿作为诊断根性撕脱伤的依据,其敏感性、特异性及准确度均较低,分别为57.1%、45.5%、63.4%。结论:MRI在臂丛神经诊断时存在对神经周围水肿、瘢痕、神经瘤及部分节后神经断裂等误诊或过度诊断的情况,但仍可作为首选的诊断方式;创伤性脊膜囊肿对诊断根性撕脱伤有提示意义,但不能作为诊断臂丛神经根性撕脱伤的标准。Objective:To explore the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging in traumatic brachial plexus injury.Methods:the MRI findings of 41 cases of traumatic brachial plexus injury were analyzed retrospectively and compared with the results of surgical exploration.Results:there was no significant difference between MRI diagnosis and surgical exploration in the diagnosis of peripheral edema,scar,neuroma,root avulsion injury,postganglionic nerve rupture and traumatic meningeal cyst(P>0.05).The sensitivity of MRI in the diagnosis of peripheral edema,scar,neuroma,root avulsion injury,postganglionic nerve rupture and traumatic meningeal cyst were 86.8%,65.4%,57.1%,78.6%,66.7%and 78.2%,respectively;The specificity was 66.7%,86.7%,100.0%,92.3%,82.3%and 94.4%,respectively;The accuracy was 82.9%,73.2%,92.7%,80.5%,73.2%and 85.4%respectively;The positive predictive values were 97.1%,89.5%,100.0%,91.7%,84.2%and 94.7%,respectively;The negative predictive values were 28.6%,59.1%,91.9%,64.7%,63.6%and 77.3%respectively.If the traumatic meningeal cyst is used as the basis for the diagnosis of root avulsion injury,its sensitivity,specificity and accuracy are low,57.1%,45.5%and63.4%respectively.Conclusion:MRI has misdiagnosis or over diagnosis of peripheral edema,scar,neuroma and partial postganglionic nerve rupture in the diagnosis of brachial plexus;Traumatic meningeal cyst has suggestive significance in the diagnosis of root avulsion injury,but it can not be used as the standard for the diagnosis of brachial plexus root avulsion injury.
关 键 词:磁共振成像 臂丛神经损伤 手术探查 3D SPACE-STIR序列
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R651.1[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7