检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李星仪 胡斌 陈凌 朱莉珍 卞梦妍 LI Xing-yi;HU Bin;CHEN Ling(Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University,Wuxi,Jiangsu,214000,China)
机构地区:[1]江南大学附属医院财务处,江苏无锡214000
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2022年第3期87-89,共3页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:江苏省卫生健康财务课题项目(CW201907)。
摘 要:目的:通过对DRG成本测算分析,为医院开展DRG成本管理提供依据。方法:选择主要诊断为未特指的胃恶性肿瘤,手术操作为胃部分切除术伴胃空肠吻合术,DRG代码为GB15的DRG分组病例作为研究对象,采用作业成本法和传统成本法分别进行成本核算。结果:传统成本法测算成本为53 469.87元,作业成本法测算成本为56 593.14元,高于前者3 123.27元。结论:作业成本法测算DRG成本更具有先进性,可为医院成本管理提供方向,帮助医院优化业务流程,降低医疗服务成本。Objective:To provide basis for hospital to carry out DRGs cost management by calculating and analyzing the grouping cost of DRGs.Methods:Taking a pilot hospital as a sample,the grouping of DRGs of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with gastrojejunostomy was selected as the research object.The grouping cost of DRGs was calculated and compared by activity-based costing and traditional costing.Results:The grouping cost of the DRGs calculated by the traditional cost method was 53 469.87 yuan,and activity-based costing method was 56 593.14 yuan,which was 3123.27 yuan higher than the former,with a difference rate of 5.84%.Conclusion:The calculation by the activity-based costing method was more realistic,which would provide direction for hospital cost management,help to optimize the business process and decrease costs for medical services.
关 键 词:医院 成本管理 作业成本法 传统成本法 疾病诊断相关分组
分 类 号:R1-9[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学] F224.5[经济管理—国民经济]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49