今古文《尚书》“二典分合”与汉新治统之争  

The Governance Between Xin and Han Dynasty by the Division and Combination of Yaodian and Shundian in The Book of History

作　　者：邵杰[1,2] Shao Jie

机构地区：[1]郑州大学文学院,郑州450001 [2]中原文化资源与发展研究中心

出　　处：《孔子研究》2022年第2期110-118,159,160,共11页Confucius Studies

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“两汉之际社会转型与文学演进研究”(项目编号:19AZW007)之阶段性成果。

摘　　要：汉代今文《尚书》有《尧典》,古文《尚书》虽多出《舜典》之目,但其内容仍包含于今文《尧典》之中。王莽立古文于学官,并以舜之后裔的身份配合五德终始的体系,最终参照尧舜禅让而代汉立新,使《舜典》得到凸显并获得意识形态色彩,形成今古文《尚书》在治统意义上的隐然对峙。后汉承前汉统绪,在意识形态上否定了王莽的舜裔设定,以此来消解王莽代汉的理论依据,确保汉室“尧后火德”之说在治统上的无虞;而在制度层面,包含《舜典》在内的古文则一直未立学官。古文经学在后汉的演变及由此形成的今古文经学格局,都无法排除汉新治统之争的因素及其影响。The Yaodian in Modern Classics, included Yaodian and Shundian in Ancient Classics of The Book of History. Wang Mang established the Ancient Classics in official academic, with the identity of the descendant of Shun, finally referred to the abdication of Yao and Shun to establish a new dynasty, which made Shundian prominent and gain ideological color, and formed the implicit confrontation of Modern and Ancient Classics of The Book of History in the sense of governance. The Later Han Dynasty inherited the former to deny Wang Mang’s identity of the descendant of Shun, so as to eliminate the theoretical basis of Wang Mang’s theory, and ensure the safety of Han Dynasty’s governance. At the institutional level, the Ancient Classics including Shundian were not been learned in official academic. The evolution of the Ancient Classics and the pattern of academic in the later Han Dynasty, cannot exclude the factors and influence of governance between the governance between Xin and Han Dynasty.

关 键 词：《尚书》 今古文 王莽 治统 

分 类 号：K234.1[历史地理—历史学]