检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈熠辉 蔡庆丰[3] 林海涵 Yihui Chen;Qingfeng Cai;Haihan Lin(Hunan University;Xiamen University)
机构地区:[1]湖南大学金融与统计学院 [2]厦门大学经济学院 [3]厦门大学经济学院金融系,361005
出 处:《经济学(季刊)》2022年第2期465-484,共20页China Economic Quarterly
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(15ZDA028);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71373219)对本研究的资助。
摘 要:与西方国家由市场主导演进的城市化不同,中国的城市化带有政府主导和“跨越式”的特征。本文以中国工业企业数据为样本,实证检验了“撤县设区”这一政府推动型城市化对企业创新的影响。研究发现,撤县设区对企业的创新活动具有正向的促进效应;机制检验表明,撤县设区通过提升域内经济的“集聚效应”和资源的优化配置渠道促进企业的创新活动;并且这种促进效应在非国有企业、高外部融资依赖度行业和东部地区的改革样本中更为明显。Different from the market-led and slow urbanization in Western countries, China’s urbanization has the characteristics of being government-led and “leapfrogging”. Our research uses the data of Chinese industrial enterprises as a sample to empirically test the impact of the government-driven urbanization of “City-County Merger” on enterprise innovation. We find that the “City-County Merger” has a positive effect on the innovation activities of enterprises. The mechanism test shows that the City-County Merger promotes the innovation activities of enterprises by enhancing the “agglomeration effect” of the regional economy and optimizing the allocation of resources. We also find this promotion effect is more obvious in the samples of non-state-owned enterprises, industries with high external financing dependence and the eastern region.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33