裁判运用社会公共道德释法说理的方法论  

On Methodology of the Use of Social Public Morality to Interpret the Law and Giving Reasons in Judicial Adjudication

作　　者：孙海波 Sun Haibo

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学比较法学研究院

出　　处：《中国应用法学》2022年第2期71-83,共13页China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence

摘　　要：近年来一些社会热点案件频繁进入公众视线,并激起了强烈的法律争辩,尤其是那些具有重大社会影响或涉及道德评价的热点案件,更是严重刺激了社会公众的道德神经。法官一方面要坚持从法律立场出发进行判断,另一方面也不能完全置道德情理于不顾。为此,在司法中贯彻社会公共道德对裁判说理具有重要意义,它既能和传统法律解释方法相结合充分阐释出法律中蕴含的文理、法理、情理和常理,又能为裁判结论的实质合理性提供强有力的理由支撑。司法中运用社会公共道德应严格遵循法律方法论所设定的诸种限制,避免以朴素的道德判断直接取代专业的法律判断,从而有机地融通依法裁判与个案正义。In recent years, some hot social cases have frequently caught the public eye and aroused strong legal debate, especially in those hot cases with significant social impact or involving moral evaluation that have seriously stimulated the moral nerves of the public. On the one hand, judges should insist on judging from the legal position, on the other hand, they cannot completely disregard moral reasons. Therefore,the implementation of social public morality in adjudication is of great significance to the judicial reasoning. It can not only combine with the traditional methods of legal interpretation to fully explain the literary, ratio juris, Qing(human sentiment)-Li(reason)and common sense contained in the law, but also provide strong theoretical support for the substantive rationality of the judicial decision. The application of social public morality in adjudication should strictly follow all kinds of restrictions set by legal methodology, and avoid directly replacing professional legal judgment with simple moral judgment, so as to organically integrate adjudication under law and achieving justice in individual cases.

关 键 词：社会公共道德 社会主义核心价值观 法律解释 裁判说理 依法裁判 

分 类 号：D64[政治法律—政治学] D926.13[政治法律—中外政治制度]