宪法最高法律效力规范分析  

Analysis of the Source of the Supreme Legal Force of the Constitution

作　　者：王世涛[1] Wang Shitao

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院

出　　处：《比较法研究》2022年第2期149-160,共12页Journal of Comparative Law

摘　　要：宪法最高法律效力是制宪权行使的标志,但宪法最高法律效力规范不应以绝对主权为根据,制宪权的相对化及自然法的人权价值构成了宪法最高法律效力规范的法理基础。宪法最高法律效力不完全依赖于宪法效力自我宣称的规范形式。就效力范围而言,宪法最高法律效力规范直接作用于公权力(主要是立法权)而非私权利,由此私法自治的必要空间得以保留;而且宪法最高法律效力规范对后代并不当然具有“前在”或“先定”的效力,但可默示推定。The supreme legal force of the constitution is the symbol of the exercise of the constitution-creating power.However,it should not be justified by the absolute sovereignty.Instead,its legal basis lies in the value of human rights in natural law,and the power to create constitution is not absolute but relative.It cannot solely depend on the constitution’s self-proclaimed effect.The scope of its effect covers the public power(mainly legislative power)rather than private rights,and thus the necessary space for the autonomy in private law can be reserved.Moreover,it does not have"pre-existing"or"pre-determined"effect on the future generations,but can be implicitly presumed.

关 键 词：宪法最高法律效力 规范分析 制宪权 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]