《关税与贸易总协定》第20条(g)款在稀土案中的法律适用  

Application of Article 20(g)of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade in the Rare Earth Case

作　　者：马晓青[1] MA Xiao-qing(North-West Minorities University,Lanzhou 730030,China)

机构地区：[1]西北民族大学法学院,甘肃兰州730030

出　　处：《青海师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第5期34-39,共6页Journal of Qinghai Normal University（Social Sciences）

摘　　要：出于国家安全和环境保护的考虑,中国对稀土、钨、钼实施了出口限制措施,美日欧对中国的这一措施不满,将中国诉至WTO争端解决机构。我国应诉并援引《关税与贸易总协定》GATT1994第20条(g)款进行抗辩。最终裁决结果是中国违反了入世承诺书,援引GATT1994第20条(g)款失败。我国败诉值得深思,结合稀土案援引GATT1994第20条(g)款失败的原因,对GATT1994第20条(g)款的适用深入研究,为我国将来更好地规制稀土等稀缺资源出口提供对策建议。In consideration of national security and environmental protection,China has imposed export restrictions on rare earths,tungsten,and molybdenum.The United States,Japan and Europe are dissatisfied with China's measures and sued China to the WTO dispute settlement body.China responded and invoked Article 20(g)of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade as a defense.The final verdict was that China violated its WTO commitment letter and failed to invoke Article 20(g)of GATT 1994.China’s loss of the lawsuit is worthy of consideration.Combined with the failure of citing Article 20(g)of GATT1994 in the rare earth case,an in-depth study on the application of Article 20(g)of GATT1994 will provide countermeasures and suggestions for China’s future regulations on rare earth and other scarce resources.

关 键 词：稀土案 GATT第20条(g)款 出口配额 

分 类 号：D996.1[政治法律—经济法学]