主客观相统一原则下“逃逸”处罚规则的重构  

Reformation of"Escape"Penalty Rule under the Principle of Subjective and Objective Unity

作　　者：王作全 鄢楠 WANG Zuo-quan;YAN Nan(School of Law and Sociology,Qinghai Normal University,Xining 810016,China;Law School of Hunan University,Changsha,410082,China)

机构地区：[1]青海师范大学法学与社会学学院,青海西宁810016 [2]湖南大学法学院,湖南长沙410082

出　　处：《青海师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第5期40-45,共6页Journal of Qinghai Normal University（Social Sciences）

摘　　要：对“逃逸”进行界定时,若遵循合法性解释、目的解释就会带来认定范围过宽从而导致处罚不公正的问题。此外,如何对逃逸致一人死亡进行处罚,无法绕过学界对《刑法》133条是否包含基本犯的争议。针对该困境可以从对“逃逸”解释的正当性角度出发,在对合法性和合目的性解释进行补充的基础上,作出更符合立法宗旨、社会常理常情的解释。对于“逃逸”的处罚规则应在运用正当性解释的基础上,应该运用主客观相统一原则对交通肇事案件进行阶段性和整体性的评价,从而为逃逸的处罚提供更准确的规则支持。When defining"escape",if we follow the interpretation of legality and purpose,it will lead to the problem of unfair punishment because the identification scope is too wide.In addition,how to punish the death of one person caused by escaping cannot bypass the academic debate on whether article 133 of Criminal Law contains the basic crime.In view of this dilemma,we can start from the perspective of the legitimacy of the"escape"explanation,and on the basis of the supplement of the legitimacy and the purpose of the explanation,make a more consistent with the legislative purpose and social common sense.The punishment rules of"escape"should be based on the use of justification explanation,and should use the unification of subjective and objective to conduct periodic and holistic evaluation of traffic accident cases,so as to provide more accurate rule support for the punishment of escape.

关 键 词：交通肇事罪 逃逸 主客观相统一原则 

分 类 号：D924.13[政治法律—刑法学]