检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐晓晴[1] 黄竞天 张笑然 Tang Xiaoqing;Huang Jingtian;Zhang Xiaoran
出 处:《湖湘法学评论》2022年第1期59-79,共21页HUXIANG LAW REVIEW
摘 要:20世纪初,法国人欧里乌被认为是最早展开法学制度论探讨的人。他使用了社会描述性方法,并在当时的法学理论争论中确立制度论的中立地位。20世纪上半叶,以意大利法学家罗曼诺和德国法学家施密特为主的实证法路线为法学制度论带来了重大的理论转折点。两人探索了以秩序为核心的制度理论,并详细梳理了具体法学概念在制度论中的具体定义。至20世纪80年代,魏因贝格尔和麦考密克提出了新制度论的法哲学方法,进一步探讨法律本体论、法律与道德的分离命题。本文将从历史视角回顾法学制度论的不同流派,梳理其中异同。In the early 20th century,the French jurist Hauriou was regarded as the first scholar starting the Institutionism in law.By the social descriptive methodology he used,Institutionalism was adopted in a neutral position during the legal debates.In the first half of the 20th century,Italian jurist Romano and German jurist Schmitt’s theory of legal positivism was considered a major turning point of legal Institution.In their theories,legal order was the core idea of Institution.And they specified several key legal concepts with institutional theory.By the 1980s,Weinberger and McCormick raised their institutional theory of law as a new legal philosophy method,and further discussed the question of Legal Ontology and the separation thesis of law and morality.This article will review the different legal Institutionism schools from a historical perspective and discuss their similarities and differences.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.41