韩国学界的靺鞨研究——朝鲜半岛古史体系的一项检视  

A Study of the Mohe Ethnic Group by Korean Scholars——A View on the Ancient History System of the Korean Peninsula

作　　者：王禹浪 王俊铮 许盈 Wang Yulang;Wang Junzheng;Xu Ying(Institute of Far East Research,Heihe University,Heihe 164300,China;Department of Religion and History,Amur State University,Blagoveshchensk 675027,Russia;Department of Humanities,Academy of Korean Studies,Seongnam Gyeonggi 13455,Korea)

机构地区：[1]黑河学院远东研究院,黑龙江黑河164300 [2]阿穆尔国立大学宗教学与历史教研室,俄罗斯布拉戈维申斯克675027 [3]韩国学中央研究院人文学部,韩国京畿道城南市13455

出　　处：《黑河学院学报》2022年第2期10-15,共6页Journal of Heihe University

基　　金：2018年国家社科基金一般项目“隋唐时期黑水靺鞨及相关历史地理问题研究”(18BZS122)。

摘　　要：韩国学界的靺鞨研究往往将其置于高句丽史、渤海史,以及韩民族主体形成过程的历史叙事中加以考察,因此,靺鞨史具有了韩国国史的意味,成为朝鲜古史体系中的重要一环。韩国学界对靺鞨族群的种族系统多有关注,积极对《三国史记》中的“靺鞨”记载予以回应,对靺鞨七部的种族血缘背景作出辨析,提出靺鞨七部并不完全出自肃慎族系,白山靺鞨、部分粟末靺鞨可能源出濊貊的观点。对靺鞨考古学文化的认识则较为全面地继承了俄罗斯学界的研究范式。The Study of Mohe ethnic group by Korean scholars take the viewpoint of the historical narrative of Goguryeo history,Bohai history and the formation of the main body on the Korean nation;therefore,the history of Mohe,being tainted with the ethnic history of Korea,has become an important link in the ancient history system of Korea.The academic circle in Korea take much concern over the racial system of Mohe ethnic group:giving active response to the records of“Mohe”in History of The Three Kingdoms,making distinctions on the background of ethnic origin regarding seven Mohe families,and putting forward the view that not all seven are from Sushen family and the Baishan Mohe and some originate from Hueimo family.The views on Mohe archaeological culture inherit the research paradigm of the academic circles in Russia.

关 键 词：靺鞨 高句丽 渤海 《三国史记》 濊貊 

分 类 号：K871.43[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]