我国流域环境污染纠纷解决机制的问题与完善——基于近两年典型案例实证分析  

On New Development of Watershed Environmental Pollution Dispute Resolution Mechanism:Based on Recent Typical Case Analysis

作　　者：李爱年[1] 何双凤 LI Ainian;HE Shuangfeng

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院,湖南长沙410081

出　　处：《南京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期62-75,112,共15页Journal of Nanjing Tech University：Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“洞庭湖生态环境法治保障研究”(19ZDA159)。

摘　　要：近两年,国家公布了一系列流域环境污染纠纷典型案例,通过对这些典型案例的实证分析可知,当前我国流域环境污染纠纷解决机制组织体系已呈现诉讼机制以两大“公益类”诉讼为中心、非诉机制以“磋商+商调+检察建议”为主导之特征。同时,也面临诉讼格局未完全理顺、非诉体系效能未充分激发、“诉非”衔接程序未彻底通畅等发展困境。因此,未来应在充分认识并把握流域环境污染纠纷特点及流域环境污染纠纷解决机制“公益属性”的基础上,树立“流域处理”纠纷解决理念。并以此为理路,以厘界“两诉”适用关系为契机,优化诉讼解纷格局;以优化“磋商+商调+检察建议”为突破口,重塑非诉解纷体系;以确立“非诉前置”为切入点,通畅“诉非”衔接机制。In the past two years,China has published a series of typical cases of watershed environmental pollution disputes.Case analysis has shown that current resolution mechanism of recent watershed environmental pollution disputes in China has taken on new characteristics.Meanwhile,it is also faced with the development predicament of the deep-rooted"regional handling",inadequate non-litigation dispute resolution methods,and unclear relationship between the two new types of litigation.Therefore,the concept of watershed settlement should be established on the basis of fully understanding the characteristics of watershed environmental pollution disputes and the"public interest attribute"of the mechanism.In particular,it will reshape the system by optimizing"negotiation and coordination";taking the"two suits"application relationship as a motive to optimize the litigation dispute resolution pattern;and establish a"non-litigation front"as the starting point to build up a cohesive mechanism between"litigation and non-litigation".

关 键 词：流域环境污染纠纷 流域环境公共利益 环境公益诉讼 非诉讼解纷措施 

分 类 号：D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]