检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈李龙 Chen Lilong
出 处:《新闻春秋》2022年第1期89-95,共7页Journalism Evolution
摘 要:当我们谈及民国时期的报业津贴之时,一般认为它有损于报业的独立,是报业发展的痼疾。在本文中,笔者对改组派在沪机关报的津贴进行了分析,发现金钱与政治“合谋”之后,不仅促进了北伐以后上海报业的繁荣,同时也增加了政治竞争与合作的方式。以报刊为中介,改组派一方面将汪精卫一度涣散的“左派”政治势力重新集结,同时将报刊缔造成可资利用的政治资源;另一方面,改组派机关报激活了上海小报市场,促使各个政治势力都角逐其中,形成了众声喧哗的局面。因此,本文认为不能完全将报业津贴看成是报业发展的痼疾。采取新闻文化史的视角,将报业津贴置于当时的社会语境,也可看到它对政党政治和报业市场产生的推动作用。When we discuss the newspaper subsidy in the period of the Republic of China, we generally regard it as a factor that has damaged the independence of newspapers. But after analyzing newspaper subsidies of the Reorganization Group in Shanghai, we find that money politics not only promoted the prosperity of newspaper market after the Northern Expedition, but also increased the political competition and cooperation. With the help of newspapers, the Reorganization Group regrouped the scattered political forces and activated the tabloid market in Shanghai. Therefore, this paper argues that the newspaper subsidy cannot be regarded as a hindrance to the journalism. In the social context of that time, we can also find the promoting effect of newspaper subsidy on party politics and newspaper market.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.4.96