自我控制影响网络成瘾倾向者的注意引导效应  

Self-control Affects the Attention Guidance Effect of Internet Addiction Tendencies

作　　者：郭玉洁 刘革[1,2] 王艺曼 GUO Yu-jie;LIU Ge;WANG Yi-man(The Laboratory of Mental Development and Learning Science,Xinjiang Normal University,Urumqi 830017,China;School of Psychology,Xinjiang Normal University,Urumqi 830017,China;Third Clinical School of Medicine,Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi 830000,China)

机构地区：[1]新疆师范大学心智发展与学习科学实验室,乌鲁木齐830017 [2]新疆师范大学心理学院,乌鲁木齐830017 [3]新疆医科大学第三临床医学院,乌鲁木齐830000

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2022年第2期262-266,249,共6页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(31960173);新疆师范大学心智发展与学习科学实验室2018年重点项目(XJNUSYS072018A01)的资助。

摘　　要：目的:根据网络成瘾倾向者的注意特点与自我控制特征对自我控制在网络成瘾倾向者非目标工作记忆引导的注意中的作用进行探索。方法:2(被试类型:网络成瘾倾向;非网络成瘾倾向)×2(自我损耗:损耗;非损耗)×2(实验条件:干扰;中性)混合实验设计。采用Stroop范式作为自我损耗任务,将非目标工作记忆-视觉搜索作为测试任务。结果:(1)非损耗条件下,网络成瘾倾向者的搜索反应时显著较快,损耗条件下,未发现显著差异;(2)非损耗条件下,未发现网络成瘾倾向者与非网络成瘾倾向者注意引导效应量的显著差异,而损耗条件下,前者效应量显著较大。结论:(1)自我控制资源损耗使网络成瘾倾向者优势消失;(2)网络成瘾倾向者自我控制资源易受损。Objective: In the dual-task paradigm combining working memory task with target search task, working memory can match working memory items with target features and distractions. The former can effectively guide the optimal choice of attention, while the latter strengthens the intensity of interference and highlights the ability to suppress the tendency of dominance. As a group with low self-control ability, Internet Addictive Tendencies are found to perform better in working memory-visual search tasks. Therefore, we try to explore this problem through experimental research. Methods: Experiment adopts a mixed experimental design of 2(participants: Internet Addictive Tendencies;non-Internet Addictive Tendencies)×2(ego depletion: depletion;non-depletion)× 2(experimental conditions: invalid conditions;neutral conditions). The Stroop paradigm was used as the ego depletion task, and the non-target working memory-visual search was used as the test task. Results:(1)Under the non-depletion conditions, the search response time of Internet Addictive Tendencies is significantly faster than the non-Internet Addictive Tendencies. The difference is not significant under depletion conditions.(2)Under the non-depletion conditions, there is no significant difference in attention guidance effect size between Internet Addictive Tendencies and non-Internet Addictive Tendencies, while under depletion conditions, the effect size of the former is significantly higher than the latter. Conclusion:(1)When self-control resources are depleted, the dominant performance of Internet Addictive Tendencies disappears.(2)The self-control resources of Internet Addictive Tendencies are prone to depletion.

关 键 词：网络成瘾倾向 自我控制 注意引导 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]