不同亚型社会退缩个体对社会/非社会模糊情境的解释偏向  

Interpretation Bias towards Social and Non-social Ambiguity Situations among Different Subtypes of Social Withdrawal

作　　者：向碧华 郑宏[2,3] 周颖 刘俊升[3,5] XIANG Bi-hua;ZHENG Hong;ZHOU Ying;LIU Jun-sheng(Shanghai Theatre Academy,Shanghai 200040,China;Shanghai Changning Mental Health Center,Shanghai 200335,China;Shanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention,Shanghai 200062,China;China Executive Leadership Academy Pudong,Shanghai 201204,China;School of Psychology and Cognitive Science,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China)

机构地区：[1]上海戏剧学院,上海200040 [2]上海市长宁区精神卫生中心,上海200335 [3]上海市心理健康与危机干预重点实验室,上海200062 [4]中国浦东干部学院,上海201204 [5]华东师范大学心理与认知科学学院,上海200062

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2022年第2期272-275,313,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(31971001);上海市公共卫生体系建设三年行动计划优秀学科带头人培养计划(GWV-10.2-XD30);上海市科技计划项目(20dz2260300)。

摘　　要：目的:考察不同社会退缩个体对社会/非社会模糊情境的解释偏向特点。方法:57名羞怯、44名社交淡漠、30名社交回避以及101名非退缩被试完成模糊情境测验和语句关联范式。结果:①模糊情境测验结果表明:社交回避和羞怯组的威胁解释偏向显著高于非退缩组;②语句关联范式结果表明:社会情境中,社交回避与羞怯组的威胁解释偏向均高于非退缩组,社交回避组还显著高于社交淡漠组;非社会情境中,社交回避组的威胁解释偏向显著高于社交淡漠及非退缩组,而社交淡漠组的积极解释偏向显著低于非退缩组。结论:社交回避与羞怯个体在社会/非社会模糊情境中表现出明显的威胁性解释偏向。Objective: To examine the interpretation bias towards social and non-social ambiguity situations among different subtypes of social withdrawal. Methods: A sample of 57 shy withdrawal, 44 unsociable withdrawal, 30 avoidant withdrawal and 101 non-social withdrawal participants completed the Ambiguous Situations Questionnaire(ASQ) and the Word Sentence Association Paradigm(WSAP). Results:①Regarding to the results of ASQ, socially avoidant individuals and shy individuals had higher scores on threaten interpretation bias than non-social withdrawal individuals;②Regarding to the results of WSAP, in the social context, social avoidance and shyness group endorsed a greater degree of threat interpretation bias than non-social withdrawal group;socially avoidant individuals also had higher scores on interpretation bias than unsociable individuals. In the non-social context, socially avoidant group also performed more threaten interpretation bias than unsociability and non-social withdrawal. The non-social withdrawal group presented more benign bias than the unsociability group. Conclusion: Compared with unsociable and non-social withdrawal, social avoidant and shy individuals showed more prominent threat interpretation bias in social/non-social situations.

关 键 词：社会退缩亚型 社会信息加工 解释偏向 语句关联范式 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]