晚清理学家王祖畬的《左传》疑辨  

The Questioning and Distinguishing on Zuo Zhuan of Neo-Confucianist Wang Zuyu in Late Qing Dynasty

作　　者：胡媛 Hu Yuan

机构地区：[1]湖南大学岳麓书院

出　　处：《近代史学刊》2022年第1期275-287,315,316,共15页Journal of Modern Chinese History

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“‘新学伪经’说的渊源、形成与回应研究”(项目号:11BZX045)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：王祖畬治经贯穿汉、宋,为学恪宗程、朱,是晚清一位典型的理学家,但长期来不受学界重视。他综采历代先儒言论而成《读左质疑》,对《左传》的成书、义例及义理等大作疑辨,指斥刘歆因媚事王莽而窜益《左传》,论述《左传》非解经之作,与刘逢禄《左氏春秋考证》堪称异曲同工。对此典型案例加以评析,可以揭示晚清理学家与近代疑经辨伪风潮的密切关系,也有助于纠补以往仅聚焦于常州公羊学派的研究缺失。Wang Zuyu,a typical Neo-Confucianist in late Qing dynasty,studied Confucian classics throughout history from Han to Song dynasties and was noted for abiding by ChengZhu Confucianism.However,he hasn’t been taken into seriously consideration in academic circles for a long time.By comprehensively adopting the comments of Confucianists in history,Wang wrote Questioning on Zuo Zhuan,which is similar to Liu Fenglu’s Textual Research on the Spring and Autumn of Zuo in three aspects:questioning the writing,evidences and connotations of Zuo Zhuan;denouncing Liu Xin for falsifying and adding Zuo Zhuan to flatter Wang Mang;expounding that Zuo Zhuan is not an exegetical work.Through studying this typical case,it is practicable to reveal the close connection between Neo-Confucianists in late Qing dynasty and the modern trend of questioning and distinguishing Confucian classics.Besides,it is also contributed to correct the study restriction of only focusing on Changzhou School in present academic world.

关 键 词：王祖畬 《读左质疑》 晚清理学 疑经辨伪 

分 类 号：K225.04[历史地理—历史学] B25[历史地理—中国史]