奥林匹克治理体系的时代窘境与纾困之道  

Olympic Governance System:Realistic Dilemma and Solutions

作　　者：任振朋 王润斌[1] REN Zhenpeng;WANG Runbin(School of Physical Education and Sport Science,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou Fujian 350117)

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学体育科学学院,福建福州350117

出　　处：《成都体育学院学报》2022年第2期24-30,共7页Journal of Chengdu Sport University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“全球体育治理失灵的表现、成因与对策研究”(20AZD135)。

摘　　要：国际奥委会对东京2020奥运会延期举办的草率、仓促决策,放大国际体育自治体系的缺陷以及凸显组织治理能力不足。同时也暴露出国际奥委会领导下的奥林匹克治理体系面临着治理主体之间利益冲突和政治斗争愈加激烈,治理客体(问题)不断扩大化与复杂化发展,治理价值呈现“善治”理念的缺失与色彩浓厚的“人治”,规制文本约束力不断弱化,治理效果评估标准缺失等时代窘境。国际奥委会在短期内通过缓解多方利益相关者的财政危机以最大限度降低新冠疫情影响,中期致力于进一步深化善治改革从而强化领导力和号召力逐步提升治理能力,长期谋划引领多元化治理主体协同合作构建奥林匹克共同体,以此促进奥林匹克治理体系新发展。The hasty decision made by the International Olympic Committee(IOC)on the postponement of the 2020 Tokyo Olympic Games amplifies the defects of the international sports autonomy system and highlights the lack of governance capacity of the organization.Meanwhile,it also exposes that the Olympic Governance System under the leadership of the IOC is faced with such dilemmas as the conflicts of interests and increasingly fierce political struggles among governing bodies,the continuous expansion and complexity of governance objects(problems),and the lack of“good governance”and“rule by man”in governance value,the increasing weakening of the binding force of regulatory texts,the lack of evaluation standards for governance effects.In the short term,the International Olympic Committee will minimize the impact of Coronavirus epidemic by alleviating the financial crisis of multiple stakeholders.In the medium term,it is committed to further deepening the reform of good governance to strengthen its leadership and appeal.Gradually improve its governance capacity.In the long run,it plans to lead diversified governingbodiesto build the Olympic community through collaboration,so as to promote the new development of the Olympic Governance System.

关 键 词：国际奥委会 奥林匹克治理体系 体育治理 纾困之道 

分 类 号：G811.111[文化科学—体育学]