脱钩后体育协会内部监察对象的界定标准  

The Supervisory Object Scope of Sports Association after Decoupling Reform

作　　者：王小光[1] WANG Xiaoguang(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200042

出　　处：《成都体育学院学报》2022年第2期68-73,共6页Journal of Chengdu Sport University

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“监察赔偿的制度逻辑和实践进路研究”(20YJC820047);上海市哲学社会科学课题一般项目“政党反腐视角下‘四种形态’的生成逻辑和规范适用研究”(2021BDS002)。

摘　　要：体育协会脱钩改革后实现独立和实体化运营,根据法律法规授权或国家机关委托管理公共事务,其内部从事公务人员属于监察对象。《监察法》以行使公权力作为监察对象的核心特征,体育协会所行使之《监察法》层面公权力应进行限制解释,因其本质上是以社会公权力为外在形式的国家公权力。体育协会内部存在“国家授权”的公权力和自治权,两类权力边界存在动态变化,内部人员身份多样复杂,应在充分考虑体育协会特殊性基础上界定监察对象。在明确体育协会内部权力边界基础上,以公权力、岗位权责和监管国有资产为标准,可将体育协会中的监察对象分为在特定岗位上行使公权力的人员和临时聘任行使公权力的人员,并涵盖外籍人员等实质行使公权力的人员。After decoupling reform,sports associations can operate as independent entities.They are granted to manage public affairs according to legal authorization or administrative trust,therefore,their staff are objects of supervision.Since exercise of public power is the core feature of supervisory object,the public power exercised by sports associations should be given limitation interpretation,for it is essentially a state public power exercised in the form of social public power.There are public power and autonomy“authorized by the state”within sports associations,and the boundary between them are in constant change.Since the identities of internal personnel are diverse and complex,the object of supervision should be defined while fully considering the particularity of sports associations.On the basis of clarifying the internal power boundary of sports associations,and according to the criteria of public power,post rights and responsibilities,and supervision of state-owned assets,the supervisory objects in sports associations can be divided into those who exercise public power in specific positions and those who are temporarily hired to exercise public power,including foreign personnel who substantially exercise public power.

关 键 词：脱钩改革 体育协会 监察对象 行使公权力 标准体系 

分 类 号：G812.1[文化科学—体育学]