协商民主视角下邻避冲突风险的应对——基于无锡锡东垃圾焚烧发电厂复工项目的个案分析  

Coping with NIMBY Conflict Risk from the Perspective of Deliberative Democracy:Based on the Case Analysis of the Resumption of Xidong Waste Incineration Power Plant in Wuxi

作　　者：许波荣 金林南[1] XU Borong;JIN Linnan(School of Marxism,Hohai University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 211100,China;Party School of the Wuxi CPC Committee,Wuxi,Jiangsu 214000,China)

机构地区：[1]河海大学马克思主义学院,江苏南京211100 [2]中共无锡市委党校,江苏无锡214000

出　　处：《地方治理研究》2022年第2期29-40,M0003,共13页Local Governance Research

摘　　要：邻避冲突是当代城市治理中的常见问题,以政府为代表的增长联盟和以周边民众为代表的社群联盟,他们之间的邻避冲突是邻避治理中应当着重考虑的问题。社群联盟在协商民主缺失下面临定型效应、传导效应和风险放大效应的集体困境,增长联盟因防卫性诠释、“封闭决策—事后维稳”的思维惯性、抗议活动“半隐化”,在邻避事件中处于被动地位。协商民主治理注重协商本身、制度化设计和形成公共决策。在邻避治理过程中,只有做到协商民主理念内化、主体多元化、程序规范化和平台公共化,构建政府、公众、企业、环保非政府组织等多元主体协同共治格局,注重信息公开、政民回应、协商决策的程序化设计,才能形成具有效力、风险共担的决策结果。NIMBY conflict is a common problem in contemporary urban governance.The NIMBY conflict between the growth alliance represented by the government and the community alliance represented by the surrounding people should be considered emphatically in the governance.In the absence of deliberative democracy,the community alliance faces the collective dilemma of stereotype effect,conduction effect and risk amplification effect.Due to the defensive interpretation,thinking inertia of"closed decision-maintaining stability afterwards"and"semi-seclusion"of protest activities,the growth alliance is in a passive position in the NIMBY conflict event.Deliberative democratic governance focuses on consultation itself,institutionalized design and public decision-making.In the process of governing NIMBY conflict,only by internalizing the concept of deliberative democracy,diversifying the subjects,standardizing the procedures and making the platform public,building a collaborative governance pattern of the government,the public,enterprises,environmental protection NGOs,etc.,and paying attention to the procedural design of information disclosure,government and people’s response and deliberative decision-making,can the decision result with effectiveness and risk sharing be formed.

关 键 词：协商民主 公共决策 邻避冲突 多元参与 程序化设计 

分 类 号：D630.8[政治法律—政治学]