权衡论证的逻辑解读与省思  

The Logical Reflections of Pro and Con Argument

作　　者：王建芳[1] WANG Jian-fang(Department of Philosophy,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 102249,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学哲学系,北京102249

出　　处：《湖南科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第2期29-34,共6页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目(18ZDA031);国家社科基金项目(20BZX109);中国政法大学科研创新项目(19ZFG72002)。

摘　　要：作为美国学者韦尔曼20世纪70年代提出的一种独特的论证类型,权衡论证不应被视为与演绎、归纳并列的第三类论证,因为无论从论证构成还是论证评估视角看,权衡论证都与演绎、归纳论证有交叉和重合,并且,它还兼具“证成结论”与“达成说服”双重目的,表现出一定的论辩色彩。就权衡论证中的反面理由而言,它既不应被视为“反驳”,也不应单单被视为“论辩策略”,而应被看作论证核心层的重要组成部分,否则“权衡”论证将无从谈起。As a distinct type of argument developed by Wellman in the 1970 s,the pro and con argument shouldn’t be seen as the third-type argument alongside the deductive and inductive argument.From the viewpoint of argument component and argument evaluation,they overlap with each other.The pro and con argument has two functions of justification and persuasion,and thus is argumentative,while the deductive or inductive argument is monologic.As far as the counter-considerations,they shouldn’t be seen as rebuttals or only a mode of strategic maneuvering,since they belong to the illative core of the argument,otherwise the pro and con argument would be out of the question.

关 键 词：权衡论证 反面理由 反驳 推论核 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]