检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈忠纯 Chen Zhongchun
机构地区:[1]厦门大学台湾研究中心/台湾研究院,福建厦门361005
出 处:《台湾研究集刊》2022年第2期71-90,共20页Taiwan Research Journal
基 金:2021年度国家社科基金一般项目“‘两蒋’时期台湾地区台湾史研究的变迁与考论”(21BZS020)。
摘 要:中国政府正式宣布战后将收回台湾等被侵占的领土后,大陆涉台言论逐渐从实现台湾先“独立”(脱离日本的殖民统治)再“回归祖国”的“两步走”,转到“收复台湾”的问题上。作为当时最为重要的民间报纸,《大公报》除了刊发谢南光、宋斐如等台湾人士以及朱希祖、姚枬等大陆人士主张收复台湾的文章外,还针对美国社会提出的所谓战后“台湾国际共管论”,进行了激烈的反驳,迫使美方做出辩解。《大公报》关于台湾历史及两岸关系史的论述,更强调中国对于台湾的历史主权。其所提出的台湾是中国“老沦陷区”的主张,逐渐被国人接受,反映了国人对“民族自决”论的修正以及扬弃。随着局势不断明朗,《大公报》发表了不少介绍台湾现实情况、台胞复台运动的报道,并呼吁当局做好收复台湾的准备。Since the Chinese government declared its intention to reclaim Taiwan after the Sino-Japanese war,Chinese mainland discourse regarding Taiwan changed from the“two steps”policy(independence first and then return to the motherland)to the“reclamation”policy.As one of the most important non-official newspapers,Ta-Kung-Pao not only published a series of“reclamation of Taiwan”commentaries penned by people such as Xie Nanguang and Song Feiru as well as mainland Chinese such as Zhu Xizu and Yao Zhan;it also provided strong rebuttal to the“international condominium”proposal spread in the American society and pressured the US government to respond.The Ta-Kung-Pao narrative of the Taiwan history and the cross-Straits relations emphasized the Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan.Its argument about Taiwan as an“old occupied region”was gradually accepted by the general Chinese people,who moved away from the principle of national self-determination.With victory in sight,Ta-Kung-Pao printed a variety of reports on Taiwan’s current affairs and Taiwan Residents voices advocating the return of the islands to China.In the meanwhile,the newspaper appealed to the Chinese government to prepare for the reclamation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.96.88