商业秘密许可费赔偿规则研究  

Research on the Rules of Damages Measured by Royalty Fees for Trade Secret Infringement

作　　者：马一德[1] 汪婷 Ma Yide;Wang Ting

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学 [2]中关村知识产权战略研究院

出　　处：《竞争政策研究》2022年第2期13-22,共10页Competition Policy Research

基　　金：2021年国家社科基金重大项目《新形势下我国参与知识产权全球治理的战略研究》(21&ZD164)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：许可费是商业秘密侵权损害赔偿的计算依据之一,也是商业秘密市场价值认同的法律化表达。但我国目前《反不正当竞争法》中并未规定商业秘密的许可费赔偿方法,相关规定仅散见于司法解释、部门规章中,不尽一致,相互冲突,进而导致司法适用率低,制度“空转”,以及过度强调既定许可费,举证难、认定难等现实问题。基于此,在借鉴域外相关经验和做法的基础上,我国应明确平行适用的立法模式,统一许可费赔偿的司法裁判标准,系统总结许可费赔偿额认定的相关考量因素、适用场景,采用多元化的许可费赔偿数额认定方法。The royalty fee is one of the calculation methods of damages for trade secret infringement,and it is also a legal expression of the recognition of the market value of trade secrets.However,the current Chinese Anti-Unfair Competition Law does not stipulate the rules of damages measured by royalty fees for trade secret infringement,and the relevant provisions are only scattered in judicial interpretations and departmental regulations,which are inconsistent and confl ict with each other,resulting in a low rate of judicial application and a system“idling”,as well as overemphasizing the established royalty fees,difficult to produce evidence,difficult to identify and other practical problems.Based on this,on the basis of learning from relevant foreign experience and practices,China should clarify the legislative model of parallel application,unify the judicial judgment standards for damages measured by royalty fees,systematically summarize the relevant considerations and applicable scenarios for the determination of damages measured by royalty fees,and adopt diversifi ed methods for determining the damages measured by royalty fees.

关 键 词：商业秘密 许可费 损害赔偿 市场价值 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]