检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李泽武 孙国强 赵云[3] 范翠芳[4] 陈慧君[5] 冯玲[6] 沈健[7] 夏革清[8] 陈辉[8] 王斌[1,2] 李智文[1,2] LI Zewu;SUN Guoqiang;ZHAO Yun;FAN Cuifang;CHEN Huijun;FENG Ling;SHEN Jian;XIA Geqing;CHEN Hui;WANG Bin;LI Zhiwen(Institute of Reproductive and Child Health,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,School of Public Health,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学生育健康研究所,100191 [2]北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系,100191 [3]华中科技大学附属湖北省妇幼保健院产科,430070 [4]武汉大学人民医院产科,430060 [5]武汉大学中南医院妇产科,430071 [6]华中科技大学附属同济医院围产医学科,武汉430030 [7]华中科技大学附属武汉市中心医院产科,430014 [8]华中科技大学附属协和医院妇产科,武汉430022
出 处:《中国生育健康杂志》2022年第3期206-210,共5页Chinese Journal of Reproductive Health
基 金:国家重点研发计划(2020YFC0846300)。
摘 要:目的描述新冠疫情期间孕产妇的分娩方式现状,并探索确诊和曾经疑似感染新冠病毒对于分娩方式的影响。方法本研究是2020年5月15日—2020年9月18日在武汉建立的回顾性队列,研究人群包括确诊感染新冠病毒孕产妇127名,曾经疑似感染新冠病毒孕产妇255名,未感染新冠病毒孕产妇515名。通过比较确诊组和未感染组的分娩方式情况来探索新冠病毒及其次生效应(心理、生活方式等的综合影响)对于分娩方式的影响,通过比较确诊组和曾经疑似组的分娩方式情况来探索新冠病毒本身对于分娩方式的影响。结果确诊组、曾经疑似组和未感染组的剖宫产率分别为74.0%、73.3%和55.5%。在多变量模型中,在以未感染组作为参照时,发现确诊感染新冠病毒(PR:1.36,95%CI:1.19~1.54)和曾经疑似感染新冠病毒(PR:1.24,95%CI:1.11~1.39)均为剖宫产的危险因素;在以曾经疑似组作为参照时,确诊感染新冠病毒(PR:1.09,95%CI:0.96~1.24)与剖宫产无关联。结论确诊和曾经疑似感染新冠病毒可能是剖宫产的危险因素,造成确诊和曾经疑似感染新冠病毒增加剖宫产风险的原因可能是临床上在疫情早期对于疾病的认识不足以及相关医疗设施的缺乏。Objective To describe the current status of different delivery modes among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic and to investigate the influence of SARS-CoV-2 infection on delivery mode.Methods This study was a retrospective cohort study built in Wuhan between May and September,2020.Three groups of pregnant women had been recruited in this cohort including:127 pregnant women who were confirmed to infect with SARS-CoV-2,255 pregnant women who were preciously suspected to infect with SARS-CoV-2 and 515 uninfected pregnant women.The total effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its secondary effect(including influence on mental,lifestyle etc.)was explored by comparing the status of delivery mode in confirmed group and uninfected group.The specific effect of SARS-CoV-2 virus itself was explored by comparing the status of delivery mode in confirmed group and previously suspected group.Results The prevalence of caesarean section in confirmed group,previously suspected group and uninfected group were 74.0%,73.3%and 55.5%.In multivariate model,the SARS-CoV-2 infection(PR:1.36,95%CI:1.19-1.54)and previously suspected infection(PR:1.24,95%CI:1.11-1.39)were associated with caesarean section when uninfected group was taken as the inference group;the SARS-CoV-2 infection(PR:1.09,95%CI:0.96-1.24)was not associated with caesarean section.Conclusion SARS-CoV-2 confirmed infection and previously suspected infection may increase the risk of caesarean section,and the lack of knowledge of SARS-CoV-2 and medical facilities may be the potential reason of the increase.
分 类 号:R17[医药卫生—妇幼卫生保健]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249