中国史学话语体系建构中的“西方中心论”问题  

The Problem of Western-centrism in the Construction of Chinese Discourse System of Historiography

作　　者：顾銮斋[1] Gu Luanzhai

机构地区：[1]山东大学历史文化学院,250100

出　　处：《史学理论研究》2022年第2期119-132,160,共15页Historiography Bimonthly

摘　　要：建构中国史学话语体系需要突破“西方中心论”。而突破“西方中心论”,首先需要认识中国史学话语体系建构的现实基础,明晰“西方中心论”的传入历史,评估其存在的现状和突破的难度。无论“西方中心论”还是中国史学话语体系,都不单纯是理论问题,都与国家实力密不可分,因此,应将两者与国家实力的关系问题纳入突破和建构的思考。而由于“西方中心论”对中国历史研究形成了广泛而深入的影响与制约,体系建构应该在重新认识中西方历史的基础上进行。关于“西方中心论”的评价,我们应秉持一分为二的原则,对它的基本体系必须予以否定、解构、突破,直至颠覆;同时,也要肯定那些合理的、积极的、有价值的部分,将它们作为学术资源予以吸纳或利用,以助力我们的话语体系建构。In developing Chinese discourse system of historiography,we need to overcome Western-centrism. To do so,we must first and foremost grasp the historical and realistic basis for Chinese historiography. We need to familiarize ourselves with the historical process of the spread of Western-centrism in China,to evaluate its current state of existence,and assess the difficulty of challenging it. Neither Western-centrism nor Chinese discourse of historiography is merely a purely theoretical issue. Instead,their existence is inseparable from national strength. Therefore,while discussing relationship between the two systems,one needs to address the question of national strength. The promotion of Chinese discourse of historiography should be carried out on the basis of re-understanding Chinese and Western histories,because Westerncentrism has formed extensive and in-depth influence and imposed great constraints on historical research in China. To evaluate Western-centrism,we should adhere to historical dialectics. On the one hand,the foundation of this system must be negated,deconstructed,transcended,and even subverted;on the other hand,we must also acknowledge those reasonable,positive,and valuable elements,and absorb or utilize them as resources to construct our own system.

关 键 词：话语体系 西方中心论 封建主义 自我汉学化 自我批判精神 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]