服务贸易国内规制问题研究--基于WTO谈判模式的视角  

Research on the Issue of Domestic Regulation of Services Trade:From a WTO Negotiation Mode Perspective

作　　者：张艳[1] 杨宏旭 唐宜红[2] ZHANG Yan;YANG Hongxu;TANG Yihong

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学国际经济与贸易学院,北京100082 [2]对外经济贸易大学国际经济贸易学院,北京100029

出　　处：《国际商务研究》2022年第2期37-47,共11页International Business Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“中国服务业扩大开放、效率与产业安全协调发展政策研究”(项目编号:20210052);国家自然科学基金专项项目“增加多边贸易体系灵活性的诸边谈判机制研究”(项目编号:71941011);“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金”项目;“中央财经大学科研创新团队支持计划”项目

摘　　要：2021年12月,中国、欧盟和美国等67个WTO成员完成服务贸易国内规制议题谈判。本文通过对服务贸易国内规制议题谈判历程及谈判模式的回顾,提出在WTO多边框架内推动开放式诸边谈判模式,并梳理出服务贸易国内规制谈判的焦点和难点,建议应在服务贸易国内规制法律解释、必要性测试、政策透明度和监管一致性以及发展中国家待遇等4个重要议题上推进谈判。中国在服务贸易国内规制的开放式诸边谈判中应秉持“跟随致胜”战略理念,既持有中国立场,也要发展中国实力。In December 2021,67 WTO members have completed negotiations on domestic regulation of trade in services.Based on the review of the negotiation experience,this paper creatively proposes that members should promote the open plurilateral agreement negotiations(OPAs)within the multilateral framework of WTO.The focus and difficulty of domestic regulation negotiation are pointed out,such as the negotiation should be promoted on four key issues:legal interpretation of domestic regulation of trade in services,necessity test,policy transparency and regulatory consistency,and the treatment of developing countries.China should adhere to the strategic concept of“following to win”in the open plurilateral negotiations on domestic regulation of trade in services.Besides,China should hold China’s position in the negotiations and develop China’s strength in trade in services.

关 键 词：国内规制 服务贸易 WTO 开放式诸边谈判 关键多数协定 

分 类 号：F744[经济管理—国际贸易] F743.1[经济管理—产业经济]