“经济强制”:理论批判与分析框架构建  

Economic Coercion:Theoretical Critique and Analytical Framework

作　　者：解楠楠 张晓通 邢瑞磊[3] XIE Nannan;ZHANG Xiaotong;XING Ruilei

机构地区：[1]郑州大学政治与公共管理学院,郑州450000 [2]复旦大学“一带一路”及全球治理研究院,上海200433 [3]武汉大学政治与公共管理学院,武汉430072

出　　处：《国际展望》2022年第3期79-96,159,160,共20页Global Review

基　　金：2020年度国家社科基金重大项目“百年变局下的全球治理与‘一带一路’关系研究”(20&ZD147)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：当前,美国及其盟友刻意淡化其反华活动严重破坏国际规则和道义的事实,将中国的正当反制污名化,操纵国际舆论,极力渲染“中国经济强制论”,并为其编造的“中国威胁论”提供所谓“新证据”。中国一些媒体在为中国正名时不自觉地陷入了西方思维和理论陷阱中,包括将“Economic Coercion”译成更具贬义的“经济胁迫”。本文在梳理与反思西方社会关于“经济强制”研究成果的基础上,通过对中美“经济强制”政策逻辑和实践的比较,认为美国的“经济强制”呈现进攻性和霸权性,其目标国家具有全球性,并往往成为对目标国家的全方位攻击,目的在于巩固和维护美国的全球领导地位。中国的“经济强制”具有典型的防御性,其目标行为具有特定性,影响范围和损害程度相对有限,目的在于纠正目标国家的行为,推动双方关系回到正轨。At present,the United States and its allies deliberately distort the fact that their anti-China activities have seriously undermined international rules and morality,stigmatize China’s legitimate countermeasures,and vigorously exaggerate the“China-economic coercion theory”in order to manipulate international public opinion and provide“new evidence”for their concocted“China-threat theory.”The Chinese media,while trying to do justice to China,unconsciously fall into the trap of Western thinking and theory,even translating“Economic Coercion”into the more pejorative term“Economic Compellence.”Based on this,this paper compares and reflects on the existing research findings on“Economic Coercion”in Western societies and argues that as an instrument or relationship,“Economic Coercion”is a global phenomenon and does not necessarily imply hegemonic practices.Through a comparative study of the policy logic and practice of“Economic Coercion”in China and the United States,it is argued that“Economic Coercion”of the U.S.is considered to be offensive and hegemonic in nature,which targets all countries around the world and often targets countries rather than state’s behavior.The U.S.implements economic securitization policies on security grounds and shifts from focusing on the use of bilateral asymmetric dependencies to the use of global relationship networks.The aim is always to consolidate and maintain the U.S.global leadership position.On the contrary,China’s“Economic Coercion”is typically defensive in nature,which targets specific countries and often takes countermeasures against anti-China practices.China mainly takes advantage of the target country’s dependence on China’s market and supply with a relatively limited scope of influence and damage.The aim is to correct the behavior of the target country and promote the return of normal bilateral relations.

关 键 词：强制外交 经济强制 中美关系 经济外交 

分 类 号：D815[政治法律—国际关系]