隐名股东的执行异议研究——基于商事外观主义的证成  

Research on Execution Objection of Dormant Partner:Evidence Based on Commercial Rechtsschein Theorie

作　　者：曲冬梅[1] 任翔宇 QU Dongmei;REN Xiangyu(School of Law,Shandong Normal University,Jinan Shandong 250300,China)

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学法学院,济南250300

出　　处：《成都理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第1期49-56,共8页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences

基　　金：山东省社会科学规划研究项目(16CFXJ20)。

摘　　要：隐名股东能否通过案外人执行异议之诉排除对代持股权的强制执行,成为当前学理上尚存争议、实践中又广泛存在的问题。问题的解决有赖于立法中适用统一而明确的标准。通过检视商事外观主义的构成要件,建议在代持股作为执行标的异议之诉中,不得滥用外观主义和善意取得作为说理依据,应当以支持隐名股东排除强制执行为原则,例外地否定隐名股东异议权,在裁判中视具体情况加以判断。同时,限缩解释《公司法》第三十二条第三款所称“第三人”为“善意的交易相对人”。Whether the dormant partner can exclude the compulsory execution of the entrusted equity through the action of the outsider’s execution objection has become a controversial issue in academic theory and widely existing in practice.The solution of the problem requires the application of uniform and clear standards by legislation.By examining the constituent elements of commercial rechtsschein theorie,it is suggested that the rechtsschein theorie and bona fide acquisition should not be abused as the reasoning basis in the lawsuit of objection against entrustment of shares as the object of execution,and the right of objection of the dormant shareholder should be denied as an exception in accordance with the principle of supporting the dormant shareholder to exclude compulsory execution,and the judgment should be made according to the specific situation.At the same time,the“third party”in paragraph 3 of article 32 of the“Company Law”is limited to the“bona fide third party”.

关 键 词：股权代持 商事外观主义 善意相对人 强制执行 信赖利益 

分 类 号：D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学]