机构地区:[1]徐州医科大学附属徐州康复医院,江苏省徐州市221010 [2]徐州市中心医院,徐州医科大学徐州临床学院 [3]南京医科大学康达学院
出 处:《中国康复医学杂志》2022年第4期501-509,共9页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
基 金:徐州市引进临床医学专家团队项目(2018TD007);徐州市科技计划项目(KC18184,KC20136)。
摘 要:目的:探讨依据心肺运动试验(cardiopulmonary exercise test,CPET)制定的个体化运动训练方案对肺癌患者放疗前、后心肺功能及生存质量的影响。方法:按随机数字表法将40例肺癌患者分为观察组(n=22)和对照组(n=18)。对照组予常规放疗及护理,观察组在此基础上进行个体化运动训练,每次45—60min,3次/周,平均训练14.36±3.36次,持续4.79±1.12周。所有入选患者分别在放疗前1天和结束后1天进行CPET和简明生存质量量表(SF-36)评估。结果:两组患者放疗前组间比较,各指标无显著性差异(P>0.05);放疗后,观察组峰值摄氧量(VO_(2peak))(ml/min、ml/min/kg、%pred)、无氧阈(AT)(ml/min)较对照组显著升高(P<0.05)。与放疗前比较,对照组患者放疗后VO_(2peak)显著下降,峰值功率(WR_(peak))降低,二氧化碳通气当量最低值(VE/VCO_(2nadir))增加,均具有显著性差异(P<0.05)。与放疗前比较,观察组放疗后VO_(2peak)、AT(ml/min)、WRpeak功率和分钟通气量以及峰值氧脉搏(peak O2 pulse)显著增加(P<0.05),VE/VCO_(2nadir)及VE/VCO_(2slope)显著降低(P<0.05)。两组放疗前、后的静态肺功能各项指标,组间、组内比较均无显著意义(P>0.05)。SF-36评估提示,放疗前,两组间各项指标比较无显著差异(P>0.05);放疗后,观察组生理职能、躯体疼痛、精力、社会功能、情感职能、精神健康各项得分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组放疗前、后各项得分比较,差异无显著性意义(P>0.05);较放疗前,对照组精力、情感职能及精神健康得分均显著下降(P<0.05)。结论:放疗期间同步运动训练安全可行,有助于提高晚期肺癌患者运动能力,维持生存质量。CPET可用于科学评估放疗影响及制定个体化运动处方。Objective:To explore the effects of individualized exercise training program based on cardiopulmonary exercise test(CPET)assessment on cardiopulmonary function and quality of life of lung cancer patients before and after radiotherapy.Method:According to the result of random number table,40 patients with lung cancer were divided into observation group(n=22)and control group(n=18).The control group received conventional radiotherapy and nursing,and the observation group received individualized exercise training,45 to 60 minutes each time,3 times per week,with an average of 14.36±3.36 times,lasting for 4.79±1.12 weeks.All the enrolled patients were evaluated with CPET and SF-361 day before and 1 day after radiotherapy,respectively.Result:Before radiotherapy,there were no significant differences in each indicator between the two groups(P>0.05).After radiotherapy,the peak oxygen uptake(VO_(2peak))(ml/min,ml/min/kg,%pred)and anaerobic threshold(AT)(ml/min)in the observation group were significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).In the control group,post-radiotherapy VO_(2peak) and peak work rate markedly decreased while VE/VCO_(2nadir) significantly increased,compared with those pre-radiotherapy data(P<0.05).In the observation group,significant increases were also found in post-radiotherapy VO_(2peak),AT(ml/min),peak work rate,peak minute ventilation and peak O_(2) pulse(P<0.05).Additionally,VE/VCO_(2) nadir and VE/VCO_(2slope) markedly decreased(P<0.05).All pre-and post-radiotherapy indexes of static lung function compared between and within the two groups were not significant(P>0.05).The result of SF-36 evaluation showed that there was no significant difference in each indicator between the two groups at baseline(P>0.05);After radiotherapy,the scores of physical function,physical pain,energy,social function,emotional function and mental health in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P>0.05).Compared within the observation group to pre-radiotherapy,post-radi
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...