检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Anton Malienko Aarlenne Zein Khan
机构地区:[1]School of Optometry,University of Montreal,Montreal,QC,Canada
出 处:《Annals of Eye Science》2018年第1期469-469,共1页眼科学年鉴(英文)
摘 要:Background:The goal of the present study was to determine whether exogenous attentional mechanisms involved in motor planning for saccades and reaches are the same for both effectors or are independent for each effector.We compared how eye and arm movement parameters,notably reaction time and amplitude,are affected by modulating exogenous attentional visual cues at different locations relative to a target.Methods:Thirteen participants(M=22.8,SD=1.5)were asked to perform a task involving exogenous attentional allocation and movement planning.The participants were asked to fixate and maintain their hand at an initial position on a screen in front of them(left or right of screen centre)and then,at the disappearance of the fixation cross,perform an eye or arm movement,or both,to a target square(mirror location of fixation cross).A distractor appeared momentarily just before the appearance of the target at one of seven equidistant locations on the horizontal meridian.Saccade reaction times(SRTs),reach reaction times(RRTs)and amplitudes were calculated.Results:Compared to the neutral condition(where no distractor was presented),distractors overall did not result in a facilitation of SRTs at any location(shorter SRTs),rather only a strong inhibition(longer SRTs)as a function of distractor target distance.In contrast,RRTs showed strong facilitation at the target location and less inhibition at further distances.However,both SRTs and RRTs followed a similar pattern in that RTs were shortest closer to the target position and were increasingly longer as a function of distractor target distance.In terms of amplitude,there was no effect of the distractor on reach endpoints,whereas,for saccades,there was an averaging effect of distractor position on saccade endpoints,but only for saccades with short SRTs.These effects were similar when either effector movement was performed alone or together.Conclusions:These findings suggest that attentional selection mechanisms have both similar and differential effects on motor planning dep
关 键 词:ATTENTION système moteur mouvements oculaires mouvements du bras
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.141.19