检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵剑文 Zhao Jianwen(Guanghua Law School of Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310007,Zhejiang,China)
出 处:《征信》2022年第4期23-30,共8页Credit Reference
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA137)。
摘 要:在大数据背景下,政府信息公开制度面临着巨大挑战,亟待进一步变革。厘清变革的社会背景、法理基础和规范依据对于制度完善而言具有重要意义。在哈贝马斯提出的现代法三大理性维度的分析框架下,政府信息公开制度变革可从回应型法理论获得内部理性,从制度变革后的多重社会功能获得系统理性,从《政府信息公开条例》的立法目的条款获得规范理性。为适应大数据时代的新要求,未来的政府信息公开制度可从理念进化、程序拓宽、主体变革、技术引入、司法保护和安全保障六个方面展开并进一步完善,从而实现向政府信息公开3.0时代的迈进。In the context of big data,the government information disclosure system faces great challenges and is in urgent need of changes.It is of great significance to clarify the social background,jurisprudence basis and normative basis of the changes for improving the system.Under the analytical framework of the three rational dimensions of modern law proposed by Habermas,the change of government information disclosure system can obtain internal rationality from the responsive law theory,system rationality from the multiple social functions of the system changes,and normative rationality from the legislative purpose clause of the Regulations on Government Information Disclosure.In order to meet the new requirements of the big data era,the future government information disclosure system can be further improved in six aspects,such as conceptual evolution,procedural broadening,subject change,technology introduction,judicial protection and security guarantee,so as to realize the advancement to the government information disclosure 3.0 era.
关 键 词:大数据 政府信息公开 回应型法 区块链 客观诉讼
分 类 号:F832.4[经济管理—金融学] D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200