检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张昊 康帅[1] 王自法 裴笑娟[1] ZHANG Hao;KANG Shuai;WANF Zifa;PEI Xiaojuan(School of Civil Engineering and Architecture of Henan University,Kaifeng 475001,China;Institute of Engineering Mechanics,China Earthquake Administration,Harbin 150080,China)
机构地区:[1]河南大学土木建筑学院,河南开封475001 [2]中国地震局工程力学研究所,黑龙江哈尔滨150080
出 处:《世界地震工程》2022年第2期29-37,共9页World Earthquake Engineering
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(51978634);河南省高等学校重点科研项目(21A560005);广东省滨海土木工程耐久性重点实验室开放基金项目(GDDCE13)。
摘 要:目前结构的抗震分析主要是采用刚性地基假定,忽略了土-结构相互作用,而在实际情况中结构的地震破坏与刚性地基假定的预期结果并不相同。为了对比差异,本文以一6层混凝土框架结构为例,分别进行了Pushover分析和非线性时程分析。结果表明:当考虑土-结构相互作用时,结构的基底剪力减小,周期增大,顶点位移增大且结构的破坏主要集中在首层,柱端出现了塑性铰,更符合实际的震害情况。并将Pushover分析与非线性时程分析的结果进行对比,验证了Pushover分析的可靠性。At present,the seismic analysis of the structure is mainly based on the rigid foundation assumption,ignoring the soil-structure interaction,but in practice,the expected results of the seismic failure of the structure are not the same as those of the rigid foundation assumption. In order to compare the differences,this paper takes a six-story concrete frame structure as an example to carry out Pushover analysis and nonlinear time-history analysis respectively. The results show that when considering the soil-structure interaction,the base shear force of the structure decreases,the period increases,the vertex displacement increases,and the failure of the structure is mainly concentrated in the first floor,and the plastic hinge appears at the end of the column,which is more in line with the actual earthquake damage. The results of Pushover analysis and nonlinear time-history analysis are compared to verify the reliability of Pushover analysis.
关 键 词:土-结构相互作用 框架结构 PUSHOVER分析 时程反应 土弹簧
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44