检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜涛[1] Jiang Tao
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学体育法研究所
出 处:《人权》2021年第6期13-31,共19页Human Rights
基 金:国家社科基金重大课题“反兴奋剂法治体系及防控机制研究”(20&ZD337)阶段性成果。
摘 要:在体育运动中反对使用兴奋剂,已成为世界性的共识。世界反兴奋剂机构自1999年成立以来,在20多年的不懈努力之下初步搭建起了辐射全球、效率较高的反兴奋剂治理体系。这一治理体系在承担维护秩序价值之余,是否也追求人权的实现,是一个越来越受到人们关注的命题。深入审视反兴奋剂制度可以发现,对人权价值的追求和保障,也是其制度正当性的重要基础。具体到操作层面中,反兴奋剂管制所包括的检查、检测、调查、治疗用药豁免等各个环节中,都涉及人权保障的问题,现行以《世界反兴奋剂条例》为基础的规则体系也基本关照到了这些问题。中国的反兴奋剂事业,近年来取得了全面进展,不但满足了世界反兴奋剂治理的一般要求,而且在诸多方面作出了制度创新,在反兴奋剂人权保障方面贡献了中国智慧和中国经验。It has become a worldwide consensus to oppose doping in sports.Since its establishment in 1999,the World Anti-Doping Agency has made unremitting efforts over the past 20-plus years and established an anti-doping governance system with global influence and high efficiency.Whether this governance system seeks to realize human rights while maintaining order value is a proposition that attracts more attention.An in-depth examination of the anti-doping system shows that the pursuit and protection of human rights values are also an essential basis for the legitimacy of its system.At the operational level,all aspects of anti-doping governance,including inspections,testing,investigations,and exemptions for therapeutic use,are related to human rights protection.The current rule system based on the World Anti-Doping Code also covers these issues.China’s anti-doping cause has made comprehensive progress in recent years in that it meets the general requirements of the world’s anti-doping governance and has made institutional innovations in many aspects,contributing Chinese wisdom and experience to the protection of human rights in this regard.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.221