检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖杨 严安林[2] Xiao yang;Yan Anlin
机构地区:[1]上海财经大学法学院 [2]上海国际问题研究院
出 处:《台湾研究》2022年第2期21-31,共11页Taiwan Studies
摘 要:“台湾地区前途应由2300万台湾人决定”的说辞作为“住民自决论”的主要内容,是“法理台独”支柱之一。虽然“住民自决论”有其滋生的特殊历史、政治、社会、国际因素,但其偷换了“民族自决原则”的概念,实际上并不具备法理依据。因为民族自决权的行使有其特定的条件,其行使主体必须是“国族”,民族自决权也不包含分离权。“住民自决论”利用所谓的“台湾命运共同体”试图把台湾地区民众从中华民族中分离与区隔开来,企图通过“分离性公投”维持台湾地区所谓的“现状独立”,对两岸关系和平发展和国家统一造成了严重危害。大陆必须从国际法和国内外两个层面对其进行批判和反制,确保“和平统一、一国两制”的顺利实现。The saying that"Taiwan's future should be determined by 23 million Taiwan Residents"is the main content of the"resident self-determination theory"on the island of Taiwan.Although the“resident self-determination theory"has its special historical,political,social,and international factors,it steals the concept of the"national self-determination principle^^and does not actually have a legal basis.Since the practice of the right of national self-determination has its own specific conditions:the subject of its practice must be a"nation",and the right of national self-determination does not include the right of separation.The"resident self-determination theory"uses the so-called"Taiwan community with a shared future,,to try to separate the people of Taiwan from the Chinese nation.It attempts to maintain the so-called"status-quo independence"of the Taiwan region through"separation referendum"which has caused serious harm to the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations and the national unification cause.The mainland must counteract it from both international law and domestic and international levels to ensure the realization of"peaceful reunification and One country,Two systems"cause.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15