盗窃罪秘密性要素的去留——以盗窃与抢夺的区分为中心  

Removal and Retention of Secrecy of the Crime of Theft: On the Distinction Between Theft and Robbery

作　　者：邹考 ZOU Kao(School of Law,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《郑州航空工业管理学院学报（社会科学版）》2022年第2期29-33,共5页Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：北京师范大学刑事法律科学院项目(2021CCLS025)。

摘　　要：对于盗窃与抢夺的界限,现今有新旧两说之争,旧说以行为秘密与否来区分二者,新说则主张以暴力程度为区分标准。新说在推演逻辑、构建思路和界分标准上难以实现理论自洽,在一定程度上还消解了构成要件的犯罪个别化机能,不足以成为一种有力的学说。新说对旧说的批评也多基于对旧说的误解,难以撼动旧说的根基。在确定秘密性要素为客观的违法要素后,旧说的理论体系危机得以解决,其所提出的区分标准更为妥当。As for the boundary between theft and robbery, there is a dispute between the old and the new theories. The new theory is difficult to achieve theoretical self-consistency in terms of deduction logic, construction ideas and demarcation standards, and to a certain extent, it also eliminates the individualized function of crime that constitutes the elements, so it is not enough to become a powerful theory. Criticisms of the new theory against the old theory mostly result from the misunderstanding of the old theory, and it is difficult to shake the foundation of the old theory. After confirming that the secret element is an objective illegal element, the crisis of the old theory system is resolved, and the standard of distinction it proposes is more appropriate.

关 键 词：盗窃罪 抢夺罪 界限 秘密性 

分 类 号：D924.35[政治法律—刑法学]