行业协会知识产权治理与集群企业集体维权行动——创新合法性的中介效应探索  

The industrial association′s governance of intellectual property rights and the collective right protection of clustered firms:An exploration of the mediating effects of innovation legitimacy

作　　者：郑小勇[1] ZHENG Xiaoyong(School of Economics and Management,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321014,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江师范大学经济与管理学院,浙江金华321014

出　　处：《管理工程学报》2022年第3期1-17,共17页Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金资助项目(17FGL002);浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目(17NDJC275YB)。

摘　　要：我国知识产权保护采取司法救济和行政执法相结合的双轨制保护模式。由于该模式存在着周期长、发现难和诉讼烦等不利因素,对那些以版权和外观专利为主要知识产权形式的集群企业创新保护有一定局限性。因此,一些集群中兴起了一种以地方性行业协会主导,集群企业广泛参与的集体维权行动,并成了集群内知识产权保护的重要辅助性手段。然而,行业协会何以能影响集体维权行动?它是如何影响集体维权行动进而起到保护知识产权作用的?这些问题仍未探明。为此,本文提出了行业协会知识产权治理的概念,引入创新合法性的视角,并基于案例观察与结构方程相结合的方法,对行业协会知识产权治理与集群企业集体维权行动的关系及关联机理进行了理论探讨和实证分析。结果发现:(1)行业协会实施知识产权治理活动对集群企业参与集体维权行动有显著地促进作用;(2)行业协会知识产权治理能够显著提升集群企业的创新合法性(创新规制合法性、创新规范合法性和创新认知合法性);(3)具备创新规制合法性和创新认知合法性的集群企业参与集体维权行动的积极性越高;(4)创新规制合法性和创新认知合法性对行业协会知识产权治理与集体维权行动的关系具有部分中介性作用,而创新规范合法性的中介效应不显著。China has adopted the two-track protection mode of combining judicial relief with administrative law enforcement to protect intellectual property rights(IPR),the achievement of which is obvious to all.However,this kind of traditional formal institutional arrangement inevitably has some natural restrictions and limitations.For examples,it′s usually with strong universality while weak pertinence,lack of timeliness due to long application period,or difficult to find due to high cost of supervision.Those make the formal institutional arrangements not always protect the intellectual property rights well enough on some special occasions.Especially in the context of industrial cluster,the knowledge spillover is particular high due to the multidimensional proximity of society,geography,institution,organization,and cognition.Thus,there are quick imitations of products in some clusters.The traditional protection mode of patents and copyrights could not offer essential protection for intellectual property rights in the clusters because of the high requirements,the long application period,the difficulty in discovery and the trouble in litigation,which result in frequent infringement of intellectual property in clusters.That seriously harms the innovation enthusiasm and innovation vitality of cluster enterprises.Hence,in some clusters,those cluster firms have been taking collective actions based on the local conditions and industries with the help of industry association platform to protect intellectual property rights.Such an action is also called a collective action of right safeguarding(CARS)in practice.This kind of collective action plays a significant auxiliary function together with formal institutional arrangements to protect the intra cluster IPR.We are curious about what exact effects industry associations have on CARS of cluster firms.Why are there such effects?And what are the inner mechanisms by which industry associations affect CARS of cluster firms?Literature review shows that there′s still no systematic di

关 键 词：行业协会 知识产权治理 创新合法性 集体维权 

分 类 号：F203[经济管理—国民经济]