行政执法争议解决规则的检视与因应——以广东省10地级市为样本  

A Critique of the Coordination Measures for Administrative Enforcement Disputes in Ten Prefecture-level Cities of Guangdong Province

作　　者：雷娟[1] LEI Juan(School of Health Management,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510515,China)

机构地区：[1]南方医科大学,广州510515

出　　处：《云南大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第3期109-120,共12页The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：广东省哲学社会科学规划课题《行政执法争议协调机制实施情况研究——以广东省为样本》(项目号:GD17CFX03)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：行政执法能力建设是推动国家治理能力现代化的重要组成部分,其中行政执法争议的解决关系到依法行政的运行效果,也关系到国家治理能力的评价结果。自2004年起至今,广东省十余个地级市先后制定公布了行政执法争议协调办法,实施效果如何需要评估,以便为今后行政执法争议协调办法的立改废提供技术和先验的支持。以十地级市行政执法争议协调规则为样本进行比对和考察后,发现部分地级市的协调规定正面临失效的境地。剖析行政执行争议协调机制悄然退场背后的原因,碎片化政府和行政逐级发包是其治理原因,程序的复杂性以及缺少相对人参与、监督是其运行原因,机构改革致使权力行使乏力是其机制原因。树立行政一体的整体观念,构建执法责任豁免制度以及行政执法相关制度嵌入以回应执法争议生成困境;优化协调步骤,增加行政相对人参与监督机制及中止程序以破解协调办法的程序窘境;提出将职责调整为机构编制委员会办公室牵头提出协调意见以及以行政协调办法替代行政执法争议协调办法的现实解决方案。Enhancement of administrative enforcement capacity is an important part of promoting the modernization of our national governance capacity,among which the resolution of administrative enforcement disputes is related to the operational effect of law-based administration,and it is also related to the evaluation results of our national governance capacity.Since 2004,more than ten prefecture-level cities in Guangdong province have successively formulated and published the coordination measures for administrative enforcement disputes,but the implementation effect needs to be assessed accordingly so as to provide technical and a priori support for the establishment or abolition of some coordination measures for administrative enforcement disputes.After comparing and examining the coordination rules and measures for administrative enforcement disputes in the ten prefecture-level cities in Guangdong province,this research has found that the coordination rules in some cities are facing invalidation.The causes for their invalidation include the following:the fragmented government and the administrative subcontracts lead to poor governance,the complexity of the procedures and the lack of counterpart participation and supervision lead to poor operation,and the lack of power exercise caused by the inefficient institutional reform leads to its poor working mechanism.The solutions include the following:it is necessary to construct an overall concept of administrative integration and a law enforcement responsibility exemption system embedded in the relevant administrative enforcement system,optimize the procedures of coordination,invite more participation of the administrative counterparts in the supervision and terminating the procedures,and carry out the following practical plan aiming to shift the responsible authority to the Commission Office for Public Sector Reform that will take the lead in proposing coordination opinions and administrative coordination measures to replace the existing coordination measures for administra

关 键 词：行政执法争议 争议协调 失效 行政发包制 行政协调 

分 类 号：D922[政治法律—法学]