适配均衡与多元协同:社区生活垃圾分类的政策工具选择  

Adaptive Equalization and Collaborative Governance of the Choice of Policy Tools for Community MSW Classification

作　　者：刘传俊 杨建国[2] 周君颖 LIU Chuanjun;YANG Jianguo;ZHOU Junying

机构地区：[1]南京农业大学人文与社会发展学院,江苏南京210095 [2]南京农业大学公共管理学院,江苏南京210095

出　　处：《华中农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2022年第3期139-148,共10页Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“中国特色的政府决策问责制度研究”(17BZZ071);唐仲英基金会社会进步公益类项目“居民生活垃圾分类回收政策优化研究”。

摘　　要：选取31个省级地方政府层面的73份社区生活垃圾分类政策文本,从政策工具的视角,采用扎根理论分析方法,研究社区生活垃圾分类政策系统的时空结构、政策工具与政策目标的适配以及政策工具之间的协同状况。结果发现,社区生活垃圾分类政策工具、政策目标和政策主体行动之间存在着适配性、协同性问题:在一级政策工具的选择与使用上以权威性工具为主,其次是社会性工具,再次是经济性工具;在次级政策工具的选择与使用方面,各有侧重,政策系统内部结构呈现出不均衡态势;地区间在政策工具使用的时间和空间序列上存在不协同、变化差异较大、波动性显著的特性。因此,优化社区生活垃圾分类政策工具的选择,需要充分发挥政策工具的整体性功能,保持政策工具的内部结构平衡,拓展与创新地方政策工具内涵。Taking 73 policy texts in 31 Provincial Governments as samples and based on the analytical framework of policy tools, policy objectives and actions of policy agents, this paper conducted a quantitative study on the diffusion trajectory of community MSW classification policy and the output information of the policy system. The results show that there are adaptation and coordination problems among policy tools, policy objectives and actions of policy agents of MSW classification. For example,authoritative tools are the main choice of primary policy tools followed by social tools and then economic tools. In the selection of secondary policy tools, the internal structure is unbalanced.There are incoordination of time and space in application of policy tools, significant fluctuations, and different preferences in different regions. Therefore, in order to optimize the selection of policy tools for community MSF classification, we need to make great efforts in giving full play to the overall function of policy tools, maintaining the balance of internal structure of policy tools, and enrich and innovate local policy tools with regard to adaptive equalization and collaborative governance.

关 键 词：生活垃圾分类 政策文本 政策工具选择 均衡 协同 

分 类 号：D630[政治法律—政治学]