国外核电厂乏燃料贮存方式对比研究  

Comparison Study on Spent Fuel Storage of Nuclear Power Plant

作　　者：徐健 王伟[2] 黄庆勇 王祎峰 XU Jian;WANG Wei;HUANG Qing-yong;WANG Yi-feng(Nuclear Technology Support Center of SASTIND,Beijing 100160,China;Jiangsu Nuclear Power Co.,Ltd.,Lianyungan,Jianxu Prov.222000,China)

机构地区：[1]国家国防科技工业局核技术支持中心,北京100160 [2]江苏核电有限公司,江苏连云港222000

出　　处：《中国核电》2021年第6期901-909,共9页China Nuclear Power

摘　　要：随着全球核电的快速发展,产生的乏燃料越来越多,安全管理乏燃料对于核电乃至核工业整体发展有着非常重要的意义。由于后处理和处置能力的不足、核燃料再循环利用技术的限制以及核电的快速发展,无论是成熟的乏燃料湿法贮存还是日益受到关注的干法贮存,都越来越多地成为核燃料循环过程中的必然甚至长期选项。本文通过调研国外乏燃料贮存发展状况,对国外乏燃料湿法和干法两种贮存方式进行了描述,简要阐述了国际原子能机构在乏燃料贮存费用分析的相关考虑。对湿法和干法两种乏燃料贮存方式的经济性、运行安全管理及技术特点等方面进行对比,从定性和定量的角度分析了两种方法的特点,并基于国外发展经验对国内乏燃料贮存发展提出了相关建议。With the development of nuclear power,more and more spent fuel will be generated from NPP.It s a key issue on safe spent fuel management,especially for the development of nuclear power,and even for nuclear industry.Spent fuel storage including the wet and dry storage is paid much attention by governments of different countries,under the situation of insufficient reprocessing and disposal capacity,limited nuclear fuel recycling capability,and the fast development of nuclear power.This paper analyzed and compared the wet and dry storage in terms of economy,operation safety management and technical features.Based on the comparison,some suggestions were given for the future development of spent fuel management.

关 键 词：核电厂 乏燃料管理 干法贮存 湿法贮存 

分 类 号：TM623[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]