对我国夫妻财产制度的性别检视  被引量:4

Examination of China’s Marital Property System Based on Gender Perspective

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:高蕾 GAO Lei

机构地区:[1]中国政法大学人权研究院,100088 [2]北京志霖律师事务所

出  处:《中华女子学院学报》2022年第3期38-45,共8页Journal of China Women's University

基  金:2018年国家社科基金一般项目“民法典中性别平等机制的建构研究”的成果,项目编号:18BFX188。

摘  要:妇女权利是一种人权,妇女的财产权利是妇女人权的重要组成部分,我国现行的夫妻财产制度历经70年的发展和完善,在立法上体现了男女平等的宪法原则,实现了男女两性形式上的身份平等和财产权利平等。但是从性别角度重新检视我国夫妻财产制度,发现其在制度设计和司法运行中由于忽视了婚姻家庭法调整对象的伦理性以及婚姻家庭财产关系所固有的身份属性,忽视了夫妻之间基于性别的差异所产生的不平等状态,单纯的财产法规则越来越广泛地适用于婚姻家庭领域,从而造成间接歧视替代了直接歧视、形式上的平等掩盖了实质上的不平等的现象。Women’s rights are a kind of human rights, and women’s property rights are an important part of women’s human rights. After 70 years of development and improvement, China’s current marital property system has embodied the constitutional principle of equality between men and women in legislation, and realized the ostensible equality of identity and property rights between men and women. However, by re-examining China’s marital property system from the perspective of gender, it is found that in the system design and judicial operation, due to the neglect of the ethics of marriage and family law adjustment objects and the inherent identity attributes of marriage and family property relations, the unequal state caused by gender differences between husband and wife was ignored. Property law rules are more and more widely applied in the field of marriage and family, thus causing indirect discrimination to replace direct discrimination and ostensible equality to cover up the real inequality phenomenon.

关 键 词:妇女权利 夫妻财产制度 性别差异 平等 歧视 

分 类 号:D913[政治法律—民商法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象