检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘成鑫[1] 吴立新[1] 唐颖[1] LIU Cheng-xin;WU Li-xin;TANG Ying(CCCC Water Transportation Consultants Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100007,China)
机构地区:[1]中交水运规划设计院有限公司,北京100007
出 处:《水运工程》2022年第S01期63-68,79,共7页Port & Waterway Engineering
摘 要:大型煤炭装船码头采用筒仓群储运系统,具有自动化程度高、环保效果好以及集约化发展等多方面优势,但相关储运系统装卸工艺设计无成熟的可供参考的规范。而基于经验公式的计算,无法准确反映出不同工艺平面布置方案对通过能力的影响。本文基于已建黄骅港三、四期煤炭码头工程,根据筒仓群工艺平面布置不同,提出4个典型的装卸工艺方案;然后基于Simio系统仿真软件,建立了4个方案的仿真模型,计算各个方案合理的通过能力;最后对各个方案进行综合经济技术指标比选,并给出类似工程筒仓群平面布置的优化建议。There are many advantages applying grouping silos in large export coal terminal, such as high level of automation, environmentally friendly and smaller footprint etc. But there is no mature standard for reference about the grouping silo handling process layout. However, the calculation based on the empirical formula cannot accurately reflect the influence of different handling process layout schemes on the passing capacity. This paper is based on the Phase 3 and Phase 4 projects of coal harbor at Huanghua Port. According to the different layout of the grouping silos, four typical handing process options were put forward. Then the reasonable terminal throughput capacity of every option was got by the simulation study with Simio. At last, detailed comparisons were taken among the four options about the main technical and economic indicators, and a few suggestions were given about the grouping silos layout for similar projects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.5.121