检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘鑫 张喻佳 李汶真 Liu Xin;Zhang Yujia;Li Wenzhen(Institute of Evidence Law and Forensic Science CUPL,Key Laboratory for Evidence Science of Ministry,of Education,Center for Health and Pharmaceutical Law and Ethics of China University of Political Science and Law(CUPL),Beijing,100088;Chengdu Wuhou District People's court,Chendu,610045)
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学证据科学研究院,证据科学教育部重点实验室,中国政法大学医药法律与伦理研究中心,北京100088 [2]四川省成都市武侯区人民法院,四川成都610045
出 处:《中国法医学杂志》2022年第2期111-115,共5页Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine
摘 要:微量DNA技术的普及和收集成本的降低,为建立高通量、高效率的非人类DNA数据库奠定了基础,为获取大量非人类DNA证据提供了前提条件。几乎无处不在的非人类DNA证据在法庭科学领域的证据价值不可估量。但由于数据库相对共享公开的运作模式及实务界对DNA证据的盲目信赖,也衍生出准入转化机制缺位、证据审查浮于形式等问题,因此本文在展望非人类DNA证据在法庭科学领域的证据价值的同时,也为“如何确定非人类DNA具有作为正式证据适用的正当性及合法性”提出了审查采信范式,以期为非人类DNA证据的应用实践保驾护航。The popularization of trace DNA technology and the reduction of collection costs have laid the foundation for the establishment of high-throughput and efficient non-human DNA databases and have provided prerequisites for obtaining a large amount of non-human DNA evidence.The almost ubiquitous non-human DNA evidence is invaluable in the field of court science.However,due to the relatively shared and open operation mode of the database and the excessive trust of the practical community in DNA evidence,problems such as absence of the access and conversion mechanisms and ineffectiveness of evidence review have also been raised.Therefore,besides looking forward to the evidentiary value of non-human DNA in the field of court science,this paper puts forward a review and admission paradigm for determining the legitimacy and legality of non-human DNA as formal evidences",with a view to promoting the application of non-human DNA evidence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.16