检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈祥 吕品[1] 肖明月[2] 杨君[1] CHEN Xiang;LÜPin;XIAO Mingyue;YANG Jun(School of Economics and Management,Zhejiang Sci-Tech University,Hangzhou 310018,China;School of Investment and Insurance,Zhejiang Financial College,Hangzhou 310018,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江理工大学经济管理学院,杭州310018 [2]浙江金融职业学院投资保险学院,杭州310018
出 处:《浙江理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第2期123-132,共10页Journal of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University:Social Sciences
基 金:浙江省哲学社会科学基金重点项目(20NDJC30Z);浙江省自然科学基金青年项目(LQ20G030001);浙江省软科学研究计划项目(2021C35020);浙江理工大学研究生优秀学位论文培育基金项目(LW-YP2020098)。
摘 要:创新驱动已成为我国经济发展的重要战略。为了探讨行政审批制度改革对城市创新的影响,利用2001—2018年我国281个地级市面板数据,使用双重差分法进行检验,结果表明:行政审批制度改革显著提升了我国城市的创新水平,该结论在替换主要变量、更换计量方法、区分专利类型以及安慰剂检验等稳健性分析中依然成立;西部城市从行政审批制度改革中获得的创新促进效应显著大于东部城市,中部城市获取的创新效应不显著;2008年金融危机之后,行政审批制度改革对城市创新的促进作用更加显著;机制分析显示,行政审批制度改革通过降低制度性交易成本和促进城市产业集聚提升城市创新水平。上述结论表明:推进我国技术创新仍需不断深化制度改革。Innovation-driven has become an important strategy for China′s economic development. By testing the panel data from 281 prefecture-level cities in China from 2001 to 2018 through difference-in-difference method, this paper studied the impact of the reform of administrative examination and approval system on urban innovation. The results show that the reform of administrative examination and approval system has significantly improved urban innovation. The results still remain tenable in the replacement of main variables and estimation methods, differentiation of patent types, placebo test and other robustness analyses;The innovation promotion effect obtained by the reform of administrative approval examination and approval system in western cities is significantly greater than that in eastern cities, and the innovation promotion effect obtained by central cities is not significant;After the 2008 financial crisis, administrative examination and approval system reform has played a more significant role in promoting urban innovation. It is found through mechanism analysis that the reform of administrative examination and approval system has improved the level of urban innovation by reducing institutional transaction costs and promoting urban industrial agglomeration. The above conclusions indicate that the advancement of technological innovation in China still requires to continuously deepen institutional reforms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229