基于学科规范化引文影响力和相对引用率的论文学术影响力评价  

Academic impact power assessment of papers based on subject normalized citation impact power and relative citation ratio

作　　者：陈斯斯[1] 刘春丽[1] CHEN Si-si;LIU Chun-li(Library of China Medical University,Shenyang 100122,Liaoning Province,China)

机构地区：[1]中国医科大学图书馆,辽宁沈阳110122

出　　处：《中华医学图书情报杂志》2021年第12期25-30,共6页Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science

基　　金：2020年度辽宁省图书馆学会研究课题“基于开放引文集的医学生物学论文临床转化能力评价指标研究”(2020tsgxhybkt-024);辽宁省教育厅2020年度科学研究经费项目“COVID-19科研成果的学术影响力、社会关注度及临床转化潜力评价与预测研究”(QNRW2020004)。

摘　　要：利用学科规范化引文影响力(CNCI)和相对引用率(RCR)指标对2009-2018年间医学生物学期刊PLoSOne所发论文的学术影响力进行评价,发现RCR指标在评价非医学生物学领域论文和近期新发表论文上存在一定局限;CNCI和RCR指标的基准值不同,虽然二者高度相关,但不可相互替换;RCR指标在评价跨学科领域论文的学术影响力方面更有优势。The academic impact power of papers published in PloS One from 2009 to 2018 was assessed according to the subject normalized citation impact power and relative citation ratio,which sowed that relative citation ratio plays a limited role in assessing the academic impact power of papers published in medical and biological journals,the standard value of subject normalized citation impact power and relative citation ratio is different,and the subject normalized citation impact power and relative citation ratio are closely related,but hey cannot be replaced,the relative citation ratio is more advantageous over the subject normalized citation impact power in assessing the academic impact power of scientific papers.

关 键 词：学术影响力评价 学科规范化引文影响力 相对引用率 医学生物学期刊 学科分类 相关性分析 

分 类 号：G251[文化科学—图书馆学] G252.8