检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘冰冰 王静[1] LIU Bing-bing;WANG Jing(School of Law,Qingdao University,Qingdao Shandong,266071)
出 处:《山西大同大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第2期16-20,共5页Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:山东省社会科学规划项目“法官业绩评价机制研究”(17CSPJ08)。
摘 要:认罪认罚从宽案件中应该赋予被害人量刑建议权。根据被害人拥有量刑建议权的必要性、法理依据以及预设赋予权利后的结果对被害人拥有量刑建议权进行分析,认为被害人拥有量刑建议权是具有正当性的,应保障其作为当事人的地位和诉求,并预设构建认罪认罚从宽案件中存在的三方角色程序系统,完善被害人量刑建议权整体结构的搭建。在案件处理的全部过程中,赋予量刑建议权有助于提高案件效率,完善诉讼程序,保障量刑公正。The victim should be given the right of sentencing suggestion in the case of confession and leniency. According to the necessity of the victim’s sentencing suggestion right, the reasonable legal basis and the result of preset right, the author analyzes the victim’s sentencing suggestion right. It is legitimate that the victim has the right to recommend sentencing, which is an important embodiment of protecting the victim’s status and appeal. The author presupposes the construction of the third party procedure system in cases of guilty plea to improve the overall structure of the suggestion right of the victims’ sentencing. In the case of pleading guilty and lenient punishment, giving the victim the right of sentencing suggestion helps to improve the efficiency of the case, improve the litigation procedure and ensure the fairness of sentencing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222