检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈逍 刘忠 刘立群[3] SHEN Xiao;LIU Zhong;LIU Liqun(University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan Liaoning 114051;Anshan Procuratorate, Anshan Liaoning 114002;Huainan Vocational and Technical College, Huainan Anhui 232001)
机构地区:[1]辽宁科技大学,辽宁鞍山114051 [2]鞍山市检察院,辽宁鞍山114002 [3]淮南职业技术学院,安徽淮南232001
出 处:《淮南职业技术学院学报》2022年第2期137-140,共4页Journal of Huainan Vocational Technical College
摘 要:合同诈骗与合同欺诈行为都是以合同作为达成自己目的的方式,都采用了欺诈的形式。但二者的区分较为困难,且合同诈骗承担的刑事责任远比合同欺诈行为承担的民事责任要严重得多。因此,对两者的辨析就显得十分必要。重点就合同诈骗罪非法占有目的的判断、合同诈骗罪和合同欺诈行为的主观方面内容、是否存在间接故意、合同签订后的行为表现等方面对二者进行辨析,并结合一个实务案例对两者的主观方面进行探讨,希望对司法工作能有所助益。Both contract swindle and contract fraud act take the contract as the way to achieve their own goals,and both adopt the form of fraud.However,it is difficult to distinguish the two,and the criminal liability of contract swindle is much more serious than the civil liability of contract fraud act.Therefore,it is very necessary to distinguish the two.This paper mainly analyzes the judgment of the illegal possession purpose of contract swindle,the subjective aspects of the contract swindle and contract fraud act,whether there is indirect intent,and behavior after signing the contract.The subjective aspect is discussed with a practical case to serve the judicial work.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.65