检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋阳[1] SONG Yang(Law School,Hebei University,Baoding 071000,China)
出 处:《现代法学》2022年第3期194-205,共12页Modern Law Science
基 金:河北省高校青年拔尖人才项目“数字贸易商业规则发展及中国因应研究”(BJ2020061)。
摘 要:我国签订的双边投资保护协定中对于准据法的选择大多采用复合模式,带有很强的“战略模糊性”,因此,有必要研究投资争议中国际法与东道国国内法各自的法律功能以及两者之间的适用关系。从已有投资仲裁判例所呈现出来的规律来看,应从利益分配的实体视角出发,在投资协定的框架下追求东道国与投资母国之间的利益协调最大化。仲裁庭在准据法适用时应承认和尊重东道国国内法中所体现的公共利益,通过形式判断、实体解构和程序保障三个维度实现准据法的适用平衡。The choice of applicable law clauses in most BITs signed by China have the characteristics of“strategic ambiguity”.Therefore,it is necessary to confirm the respective legal functions and the relationship of China’s international law and the host state’s municipal law in investment disputes.Based on the laws of the existing investment arbitration cases,it is considered that the interest coordination between the host state and the investment home country should be maximized from the entity perspective of interest distribution under the framework of investment agreement.When applying the applicable law,the arbitral tribunal should recognize and respect the public interests embodied in the municipal law of the host state,and realize the application balance of the applicable law through three dimensional paths,namely formal judgment,substantive deconstruction and procedural guarantee.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28