检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:毛发江 史雯妍 左玲[1] 王子良 Mao Fajiang;Shi Wenyan;Zuo Ling;Wang Ziliang(Department of Scientific Research Management,Shanghai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 200071,China)
机构地区:[1]上海中医药大学附属市中医医院科研处,200071
出 处:《中华医学科研管理杂志》2022年第2期102-106,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
基 金:上海中医药大学预算内项目(18WK125)。
摘 要:目的通过研究近3年国家基金委查处学术不端案件的特点规律, 探讨针对性加强医院科研管理和防范学术不端问题的对策。方法以2019—2021年国家基金委公开通报的6批次67例学术不端案例数据为研究对象, 对涉案依托单位情况、学术不端问题具体类型和基金委惩戒处理措施等进行分类统计, 根据学术不端问题频次占比, 分析归纳其倾向性特点规律和原因, 提出对策建议。结果 96.36%的学术不端主体责任是个人, 依托单位主体责任仅占3.63%。因科学论文和申请书学术不端共62起, 占92.50%。涉及的问题论文中, 数据造假占48.20%, 署名不实或擅署他人占35.97%, 抄袭剽窃占32.37%, 擅标他人基金号占27.33%。国家基金委共撤销涉案基金项目55项并追回资金, 67人次被取消最高7年、最低2年的项目申请资格, 2名评审专家受惩处。结论医院科研管理应吸取他人教训, 有针对性地从加强科研诚信教育、完善监督机制建设、严格落实过程管理和健全科研信用评价体系等方面提出具体的对策, 以期为在医院科研管理实践中防范此类问题提供有益启示。Objective To explore the countermeasures to strengthen hospital scientific research management and prevent research misconduct by studying the characteristics of research misconduct cases investigated by the NSFC in recent three years.Methods Information of a total number of 67 research misconduct cases in 6 batches that publicly reported by the NSFC from 2019 to 2021 were collected,classified statistics were conducted on the situation of the supporting units involved,the specific issues of Misconduct and the disciplinary measures of the NSFC.According to the frequency proportion of misconduct problems,the tendency characteristics and reasons were analyzed and summarized,countermeasures and suggestions were put forward.Results 96.36%of the main responsibility entity of research misconduct was individuals,and 3.63%of the main responsibility of relying institution.There were 62 cases of research misconduct due to scientific papers and applications,accounted for 92.50%.Among the problematic papers involved,data fraud accounted for 48.20%,false signature or unauthorized signature accounted for 35.97%,plagiarism accounted for 32.37%,and unauthorized marking of other people′s fund number accounted for 27.33%.The NSFC revoked 55 fund projects involved and recovered funds,67 people were disqualified from applying for projects with a maximum of 7 years and a minimum of 2 years,and 2 peer-review experts were punished.Conclusion Hospital scientific research management should draw lessons from others,and put forward specific countermeasures from the aspects of strengthening scientific research integrity education,improving the construction of supervision mechanism,strictly implementing process management and perfecting scientific research credit evaluation system,in order to provide possible reference for preventing misconduct in hospital scientific research management practice.
分 类 号:R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28