国内五省市及地区抗疫水平多准则决策方法排序比较分析  

Comparative Analysis of the Ranking of Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods for Anti-epidemic Levels in Five Provinces,Cities and Regions in China

作　　者：刘阿龙 屈绍建 LIU A-long;QU Shao-jian(Bussiness School,University of Shanghai for Science and Technology,Shanghai 200093,China;School of Management Science and Engineering,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044,China)

机构地区：[1]上海理工大学管理学院,上海200093 [2]南京信息工程大学管理工程学院,江苏南京210044

出　　处：《软件导刊》2022年第5期163-168,共6页Software Guide

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(17BGL083)。

摘　　要：由于评价各地区抗疫水平所参考的标准各不相同,造成评价结果不一致。为此,通过WSM、TOPSIS、VIKOR及ELECTRE4种方法(简称为MCDM方法)对国内5个省市及地区的抗疫水平进行比较与分析。首先,利用香农熵权法评估各标准对国内5个省市及地区抗疫水平的重要程度,然后基于MCDM方法对其进行定量评估,考虑到排名结果依赖于标准权重,因此最后对权重进行敏感性分析。结果表明,传播控制是评价抗疫水平最重要的标准,其次是应急救援和疫苗研发,经济和社会影响则影响最小。根据所得标准,以期为各地区抗击疫情提供参考与借鉴。The evaluation results are inconsistent due to the different standards used to evaluate the anti epidemic level in various regions.Therefore,the anti epidemic level of five provinces and regions in China was compared and analyzed by WSM,TOPSIS,VIKOR and ELECTRE(MCDM method for short).Firstly,the Shannon entropy weight method is used to evaluate the importance of each standard to the anti epidemic level of five provinces,cities and regions in China,and then the quantitative evaluation is carried out based on MCDM method.Considering that the ranking results depend on the standard weight,the sensitivity analysis of the weight is carried out at last.The practice results show that transmission control is the most important standard to evaluate the level of epidemic resistance,followed by emergency rescue and vaccine research and development,and the economic and social impact is the least.According to the obtained standards,in order to provide reference and reference for combating the epidemic situation in various regions.

关 键 词：多准则决策 COVID-19疫情 敏感性分析 标准权重 

分 类 号：TP391[自动化与计算机技术—计算机应用技术]