《民法典》第406条效力延伸规则解释论  

Interpretation of rule on the extension of personal security interest in Article 406 of the Civil Code

作　　者：范雪飞[1] 李雨岚 FAN Xuefei;LI Yulan(School of Civil and Commercial Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《天津商业大学学报》2022年第3期65-72,共8页Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“租购并举住房法律制度建构研究”(19XFX013);2021年重庆市研究生科研创新项目“动产担保物权的效力延伸规则”(CYS21143)。

摘　　要：从《民法典》第406条可以解释出动产抵押权效力延伸规则,即动产抵押权效力应当及于该抵押财产一切形态的价值替代物即“收益”之上。效力延伸规则属任意性规定,当事人可以通过限制性或禁止性特别约定排除该规则的适用。在确定收益的范围时,担保财产需要具备可识别性。担保物权效力无法对抗留置权人与正常经营活动中的买受人,未登记的动产抵押权不能对抗善意第三人。由于声明登记制缺乏公信力基础,已登记的动产抵押权不能对抗善意买受人。除现金以及已登记之原担保物所能覆盖的非现金收益之外,其余担保物之价值替代物仅在登记后方才产生对抗效力。The rule on the extension of personal security interest of movable mortgage can be explained in Article 406 of the Civil Code,that is,the effect of movable mortgage should be extended to various converted forms of collateral value which are called proceeds.The extension rule is an optional norm,and the parties may exclude the application of the rule through a restrictive or prohibitive agreement.In order to make sure the scope of proceeds is well determined,the collateral should be identifiable.The effect of movable security interest cannot confront the lienors or buyers in the ordinary course of business,and the unregistered movable mortgage cannot confront the bona fide third party.Due to the lack of public credibility for the notice filing,the registered movable mortgage couldn’t be confronted by buyers in good faith.Proceeds could confront a holder only after being filed,with the exception of cash proceeds and non-cash proceeds that are covered by the original registered encumbrance.

关 键 词：动产担保 效力延伸 收益 登记 善意买受人 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]